Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Argus Retinal Prosthesis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sagaciousphil (Try asking at Medicine Project?) |
imported>Demiurge1000 (c) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]] Need a reviewer willing to work with nominator on what's needed for DYK on a medical article. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 06:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]] Need a reviewer willing to work with nominator on what's needed for DYK on a medical article. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 06:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
::* Comment - Perhaps the nominator should try asking at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine|this project]]; I'm told they are very helpful. [[User:Sagaciousphil|<span style="color: Navy"><span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt">SagaciousPhil</span></span>]] - [[User Talk:Sagaciousphil|<span style="font-family: Century Gothic; font-size:10pt">'''Chat'''</span>]] 11:10, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | ::* Comment - Perhaps the nominator should try asking at [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine|this project]]; I'm told they are very helpful. [[User:Sagaciousphil|<span style="color: Navy"><span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva; font-size: 12pt">SagaciousPhil</span></span>]] - [[User Talk:Sagaciousphil|<span style="font-family: Century Gothic; font-size:10pt">'''Chat'''</span>]] 11:10, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::*Good point Phil - I have mentioned this nomination there. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 21:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 21:04, 31 March 2013
Argus Retinal Prosthesis
- ... that the Argus Retinal Prosthesis is the first functioning artificial eye to be approved for commercial use in the United States?
- Reviewed: Jassem Alwan
Created by Michaelmas1957 (talk). Self nominated at 09:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC).
Length and date good, and hook well cited. 'Bionic eye' is a redirect to Visual prosthesis, though. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Is this hook better? – Michaelmas1957 (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- As an outside comment of a possible issue, you may want to read WP:MEDRS. There was a fluff-up with a hook about an exoskeleton a few months back, and this may have similar issues as it is on the fence between a medical article and about a product. Chris857 (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Mmmmm. I can see the issues now. Sources aren't too specialised as well. Articles do relate that product can only help with a specific condition, and only then improve slightly. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Suggest some improvements and I'll get to work on them. – Michaelmas1957 (talk) 10:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Mmmmm. I can see the issues now. Sources aren't too specialised as well. Articles do relate that product can only help with a specific condition, and only then improve slightly. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- 16px Need a reviewer willing to work with nominator on what's needed for DYK on a medical article. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment - Perhaps the nominator should try asking at this project; I'm told they are very helpful. SagaciousPhil - Chat 11:10, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Good point Phil - I have mentioned this nomination there. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)