Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Arikamedu"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mandarax m (Disambiguate intaglio to Engraved gem) |
imported>Johnbod (Unneeded "as that" removed from hook.) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that at the '''[[Arikamedu]]''' archaeological site ''(pictured)'' Jouveau Dubreuil, an [[Indologist]] found gems and an [[Engraved gem|intaglio]] | + | * ... that at the '''[[Arikamedu]]''' archaeological site ''(pictured)'' Jouveau Dubreuil, an [[Indologist]] found gems and an [[Engraved gem|intaglio]] of [[Augustus Caesar]] and said that the site was "a true Roman city"? |
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005]] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:* Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --[[User:Bruzaholm|Bruzaholm]] ([[User talk:Bruzaholm|talk]]) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | :* Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --[[User:Bruzaholm|Bruzaholm]] ([[User talk:Bruzaholm|talk]]) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
::* {{ping|Bruzaholm}} Thanks for the review. QPQ done. May now like to give a green tick.--'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 15:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | ::* {{ping|Bruzaholm}} Thanks for the review. QPQ done. May now like to give a green tick.--'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 15:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::Unneeded "as that" removed from hook. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 17:41, 22 May 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Arikamedu
- ... that at the Arikamedu archaeological site (pictured) Jouveau Dubreuil, an Indologist found gems and an intaglio of Augustus Caesar and said that the site was "a true Roman city"?
5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 02:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC).
- Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --Bruzaholm (talk) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks for the review. QPQ done. May now like to give a green tick.--Nvvchar. 15:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
