Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Arikamedu"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mandarax
m (Disambiguate intaglio to Engraved gem)
imported>Johnbod
(Unneeded "as that" removed from hook.)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that at the '''[[Arikamedu]]''' archaeological site ''(pictured)'' Jouveau Dubreuil, an [[Indologist]] found gems and an [[Engraved gem|intaglio]] as that of [[Augustus Caesar]] and said that the site was "a true Roman city"?
+
* ... that at the '''[[Arikamedu]]''' archaeological site ''(pictured)'' Jouveau Dubreuil, an [[Indologist]] found gems and an [[Engraved gem|intaglio]] of [[Augustus Caesar]] and said that the site was "a true Roman city"?
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005]]
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:* Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --[[User:Bruzaholm|Bruzaholm]] ([[User talk:Bruzaholm|talk]]) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)  
 
:* Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --[[User:Bruzaholm|Bruzaholm]] ([[User talk:Bruzaholm|talk]]) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)  
 
::* {{ping|Bruzaholm}} Thanks for the review. QPQ done. May now like to give a green tick.--'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 15:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 
::* {{ping|Bruzaholm}} Thanks for the review. QPQ done. May now like to give a green tick.--'''[[User talk:Nvvchar|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#003366">Nvvchar</span>]]'''. 15:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 
+
:::Unneeded "as that" removed from hook. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 17:41, 22 May 2015

Arikamedu

Ruins of entry gate and structures in the Arikamedu site

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 02:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC).

  • Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --Bruzaholm (talk) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Thanks for the review. QPQ done. May now like to give a green tick.--Nvvchar. 15:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Unneeded "as that" removed from hook. Johnbod (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)