Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Arikamedu"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Passed for DYK)
imported>Victuallers
(yes)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from May 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=May 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 14:57, 26 June 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Arikamedu====
 
====Arikamedu====
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
[[File:Arikamedu, Early Historic Site 03.jpg|100x100px|Ruins of entry gate and structures in the Arikamedu site]]
 
[[File:Arikamedu, Early Historic Site 03.jpg|100x100px|Ruins of entry gate and structures in the Arikamedu site]]
</div><!--
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that at the '''[[Arikamedu]]''' archaeological site ''(entrance pictured)'', the [[Indologist]] Jouveau Dubreuil found gems and an [[Engraved gem|intaglio]] of [[Augustus Caesar]] and said that the site was "a true Roman city"?
 
* ... that at the '''[[Arikamedu]]''' archaeological site ''(entrance pictured)'', the [[Indologist]] Jouveau Dubreuil found gems and an [[Engraved gem|intaglio]] of [[Augustus Caesar]] and said that the site was "a true Roman city"?
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]). Self-nominated at 02:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Nvvchar|Nvvchar]] ([[User talk:Nvvchar|talk]]). Self-nominated at 02:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Arikamedu|Nvvchar|subpage=Arikamedu}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --[[User:Bruzaholm|Bruzaholm]] ([[User talk:Bruzaholm|talk]]) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)  
 
:* Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --[[User:Bruzaholm|Bruzaholm]] ([[User talk:Bruzaholm|talk]]) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)  
Line 28: Line 21:
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The image is properly licensed, the hook facts are reliably sourced, the article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing. QPQ has been done. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 08:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The image is properly licensed, the hook facts are reliably sourced, the article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing. QPQ has been done. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 08:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
  
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 14:57, 26 June 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Arikamedu

Ruins of entry gate and structures in the Arikamedu site

5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 02:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC).

  • Interesting article, long enough expansion; well-written and illustrated; the article is sourced; well... reading the article and sources, Mr Bebreuil's discoveries seem to be overshadowed by later, more thorough excavations, yet, Mr Debreuil's allegation "in a short note" that the site was a "true Roman city" based on his own discoveries seem correct. I'd suggest that the article is ready for DYK. --Bruzaholm (talk) 13:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Thanks for the review. QPQ done. May now like to give a green tick.--Nvvchar. 15:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Unneeded "as that" removed from hook. Johnbod (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Review needs to be completed: QPQ will need checking, and close paraphrasing and neutrality should be checked as well, since original review did not cover these aspects. Hook sourcing was not mentioned, so it should probably also be checked. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg This is a fivefold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The image is properly licensed, the hook facts are reliably sourced, the article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing. QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)