Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Arnold Wolfers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Wasted Time R (oops, forgot to list QPQ) |
imported>Maury Markowitz |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | : | + | :[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] I don't pretend to entirely understand the 29 printed pages of DYK rules, but I'm pretty sure that the edit history does not allow this to be put up for DYK. The article underwent some significant changes recently, but it has been in the mainspace for six years in a form that is rather similar to the current version for large sections of the text, and the recent edits are nowhere near enough for 5X expansion. I would suggest either asking for a bye on the DYK talk, or taking this to GA status. I would strongly suggest the latter, because there are a significant number of grammar issues that should be solved one way or the other and going GA will get that solved. Those aren't needed for DYK, of course, but GA seems to be so you may as well go for the two-fer. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 17:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 15 November 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Arnold Wolfers
- ... that as master of Pierson College at Yale University during World War II, Arnold Wolfers recruited students for the Office of Strategic Services?
- ALT1:... that Arnold Wolfers is considered one of the most important figures in classical international relations realism?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Micromégas
- Comment: Moved to article space on November 7
Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self-nominated at 21:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC).
I don't pretend to entirely understand the 29 printed pages of DYK rules, but I'm pretty sure that the edit history does not allow this to be put up for DYK. The article underwent some significant changes recently, but it has been in the mainspace for six years in a form that is rather similar to the current version for large sections of the text, and the recent edits are nowhere near enough for 5X expansion. I would suggest either asking for a bye on the DYK talk, or taking this to GA status. I would strongly suggest the latter, because there are a significant number of grammar issues that should be solved one way or the other and going GA will get that solved. Those aren't needed for DYK, of course, but GA seems to be so you may as well go for the two-fer. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC)