Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Arp 147"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris857 (final pass over article) |
imported>Coinmanj |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:::In terms of close paraphrasing, the only problematic phrases look to be "does not appear to be a part of any significant galaxy group" [https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FArp_147&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2F0004-637X%2F721%2F2%2F1348%2Ffulltext%2Fapj_721_2_1348.text.html&minwords=2&minchars=13] and "The most intense period of star formation ended 15 million years ago" [https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FArp_147&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.space.com%2F10809-black-hole-ring-valentines-day-photo.html&minwords=2&minchars=13]. Any chance that more different wording exists? They are pretty mechanical phrases, and my tired mind can't immediately think of any better wording. | :::In terms of close paraphrasing, the only problematic phrases look to be "does not appear to be a part of any significant galaxy group" [https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FArp_147&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2F0004-637X%2F721%2F2%2F1348%2Ffulltext%2Fapj_721_2_1348.text.html&minwords=2&minchars=13] and "The most intense period of star formation ended 15 million years ago" [https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FArp_147&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.space.com%2F10809-black-hole-ring-valentines-day-photo.html&minwords=2&minchars=13]. Any chance that more different wording exists? They are pretty mechanical phrases, and my tired mind can't immediately think of any better wording. | ||
::[[User:Chris857|Chris857]] ([[User talk:Chris857|talk]]) 04:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | ::[[User:Chris857|Chris857]] ([[User talk:Chris857|talk]]) 04:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::: I switched out the references. I tend to think rather "clinically" so it's difficult for me to come up with different phrasing, especially since the wording expresses the point exactly. I don't know of any other way to convey "does not appear to be a part of any significant galaxy group" without imparting vagueries and since that's just a single line, by my understanding of policy, there's no real copy vio problem. I could simply remove the word "a" without losing any meaning (?). I've changed the other sentence in question. [[User:Coinmanj|Coinmanj]] ([[User talk:Coinmanj|talk]]) 06:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 06:00, 6 December 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Arp 147
- ... that the galaxy pair Arp 147 (pictured) contains a ring of nine black holes?
Created by Coinmanj (talk). Self nominated at 05:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC).
-
- Article is new (from Nov 30), 1730B
- Cited inline
- Hook is brief, definitely interesting (9?!), and verified
- Photo in article, PD-Hubble
- Suggestions/issues
- For the sources (3 and 8 particularly) can we get some more publishing details (author, journal, date, etc)?
- Link to Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies? (your discretion)
- Okay, I'm back:
- @Smaller galaxy: The source given doesn't seem to back up the claim, though http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2011/arp147/ does.
- In terms of close paraphrasing, the only problematic phrases look to be "does not appear to be a part of any significant galaxy group" [1] and "The most intense period of star formation ended 15 million years ago" [2]. Any chance that more different wording exists? They are pretty mechanical phrases, and my tired mind can't immediately think of any better wording.
- Chris857 (talk) 04:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- I switched out the references. I tend to think rather "clinically" so it's difficult for me to come up with different phrasing, especially since the wording expresses the point exactly. I don't know of any other way to convey "does not appear to be a part of any significant galaxy group" without imparting vagueries and since that's just a single line, by my understanding of policy, there's no real copy vio problem. I could simply remove the word "a" without losing any meaning (?). I've changed the other sentence in question. Coinmanj (talk) 06:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm back: