Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Atmabodha Upanishad"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Redtigerxyz
(+alt)
imported>Maury Markowitz
Line 29: Line 29:
 
: [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]], thanks for the review. Please check these ALTs.[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 07:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 
: [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]], thanks for the review. Please check these ALTs.[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 07:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  
 +
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]])
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 12:10, 20 February 2015

Atmabodha Upanishad

Vishnu with his attributes

Created by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 09:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC).

Symbol possible vote.svg Template:Ping Unless I'm seriously misreading it, the claim in the hook is not contained in the reference it links to. That reference only mentions Akasha and Buḍḍhi in a footnote without defining them, only Manas is actually defined. I'm not doubting they are correct, we just need another source. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Maury Markowitz, thanks for the review. Please check these ALTs.Redtigerxyz Talk 07:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. Maury Markowitz (talk)