Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Atmabodha Upanishad"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Maury Markowitz |
imported>Redtigerxyz (Reply) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) | :[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) | ||
+ | :: Thanks [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]]. Linked Samanya in lead which explains the meaning.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 12:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 12:48, 20 February 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Atmabodha Upanishad
- .
.. that Vishnu's (pictured) attributes the conch, chakra and mace are mentioned in the Atmabodha Upanishad, which denote Akasha (ether), Manas (mind) and Buddhi (intelligence)?
Created by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 09:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC).
- I've fixed the DN's in the hook. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:Ping Unless I'm seriously misreading it, the claim in the hook is not contained in the reference it links to. That reference only mentions Akasha and Buḍḍhi in a footnote without defining them, only Manas is actually defined. I'm not doubting they are correct, we just need another source. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... the Atmabodha Upanishad explains "state of knowledge of the inner self"?
- ALT2: ... the Atmabodha Upanishad speaks on the "Absolute Reality"?
- Maury Markowitz, thanks for the review. Please check these ALTs.Redtigerxyz Talk 07:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. Maury Markowitz (talk)
- Thanks Maury Markowitz. Linked Samanya in lead which explains the meaning.--Redtigerxyz Talk 12:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)