Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martinevans123
(Millis Vindaloo, anyone?)
imported>BlueMoonset
(Charlotte Rose cannot be added to nomination as the article is too old to qualify for DYK)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:*''Secondary comment'': there's also the related article '''[[Charlotte Rose]]''', which is about twenty days old and could provide the basis for a double hook; I've asked that article's creator, {{user|ISD}}, if he'd like to contribute to the discussion. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 09:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
+
:*''Secondary comment'': there's also the related article [[Charlotte Rose]], which is about twenty days old and could provide the basis for a double hook; I've asked that article's creator, {{user|ISD}}, if he'd like to contribute to the discussion. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 09:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
::*''Reply to above'': Possible suggestion combining both articles - '''ALT1'''  ... that in protest to the '''[[Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014]]''' sex worker '''[[Charlotte Rose]]''' organised a mass [[facesitting]] demonstration in [[Parliament Square]]?  [[User:ISD|ISD]] ([[User talk:ISD|talk]]) 16:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
+
::*''Reply to above'': Possible suggestion combining both articles - '''ALT1'''  ... that in protest to the '''[[Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014]]''' sex worker [[Charlotte Rose]] organised a mass [[facesitting]] demonstration in [[Parliament Square]]?  [[User:ISD|ISD]] ([[User talk:ISD|talk]]) 16:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  
 
*Perhaps we should go with a hook that's less in-your-face:
 
*Perhaps we should go with a hook that's less in-your-face:
 
::'''ALT2'''... that a [[Parliament Square]] protest against a '''[[Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014|ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos]]''' featured slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
 
::'''ALT2'''... that a [[Parliament Square]] protest against a '''[[Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014|ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos]]''' featured slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
 
(It's in the Telegraph article.) [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 22:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC) <small>{{U|Martinevans123}}: I feel there's an opportunity here re ''urine'' and ''streaming'', but the words just aren't flowing. Can you help out? (Nothing too [[Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Bacon_and_Hams|ham-handed, please]], and no [[I Am Curious (Yellow)|yellow journalism]] etc.)</small>
 
(It's in the Telegraph article.) [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 22:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC) <small>{{U|Martinevans123}}: I feel there's an opportunity here re ''urine'' and ''streaming'', but the words just aren't flowing. Can you help out? (Nothing too [[Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Bacon_and_Hams|ham-handed, please]], and no [[I Am Curious (Yellow)|yellow journalism]] etc.)</small>
:::'''ALT2a''': ... that sex worker '''[[Charlotte Rose]]''' organised a protest in [[Parliament Square]] against '''[[Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014|a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos]]''', which included slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
+
:::'''ALT2a''': ... that sex worker [[Charlotte Rose]] organised a protest in [[Parliament Square]] against '''[[Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014|a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos]]''', which included slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
 
:::That said, the facesitting part was the most notable part of the protest. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:::That said, the facesitting part was the most notable part of the protest. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]])</sup> 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 
Fine with me. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed {{u|Martinevans123}} hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))
 
Fine with me. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed {{u|Martinevans123}} hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))
Line 33: Line 33:
 
::Nonetheless you have. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 
::Nonetheless you have. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:::I refuse to [[Curry's paradox|reply]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 20:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:::I refuse to [[Curry's paradox|reply]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 20:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed. Unfortunately, as [[Charlotte Rose]] was created on November 28, nineteen days before this nomination was made, it is not eligible for DYK, given the seven-day requirement. The article can be given a regular link in the hooks involving her, but not a bold link (and I've removed the bolding from those suggested hooks). [[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]], if you'd prefer not to use the hooks with her name, please let us know. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 16:16, 2 January 2015

Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014

  • Reviewed: Did you know nominations/Hans Krueger
  • Comment: Okay, I'm aware that we're typically squeamish about sex-related topics on the main page, but I honestly can't think of any reason not to add this; the key topic when discussing the regulations is censorship, not pornography in itself, and the article passes all of the normal criteria.

Created by Sceptre (talk). Self nominated at 04:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Secondary comment: there's also the related article Charlotte Rose, which is about twenty days old and could provide the basis for a double hook; I've asked that article's creator, ISD (talk⧼dot-separator⧽contribs), if he'd like to contribute to the discussion. Sceptre (talk) 09:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Perhaps we should go with a hook that's less in-your-face:
ALT2... that a Parliament Square protest against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos featured slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?

(It's in the Telegraph article.) EEng (talk) 22:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Template:U: I feel there's an opportunity here re urine and streaming, but the words just aren't flowing. Can you help out? (Nothing too ham-handed, please, and no yellow journalism etc.)

ALT2a: ... that sex worker Charlotte Rose organised a protest in Parliament Square against a ban on depiction of certain sexual practices in streaming videos, which included slogans such as "Urine for a shock if you expect us to stop"?
That said, the facesitting part was the most notable part of the protest. Sceptre (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Fine with me. EEng (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC) (Very disappointed Template:U hasn't chimed in with something utterly filthy. EEng (talk) 16:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC))

I couldn't possibly lower myself. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Nonetheless you have. EEng (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
I refuse to reply. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. Unfortunately, as Charlotte Rose was created on November 28, nineteen days before this nomination was made, it is not eligible for DYK, given the seven-day requirement. The article can be given a regular link in the hooks involving her, but not a bold link (and I've removed the bolding from those suggested hooks). Sceptre, if you'd prefer not to use the hooks with her name, please let us know. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)