Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Aztec thrush"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gulumeemee (Nominating Aztec thrush for DYK) |
imported>Cyclonebiskit (good to go!) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] 5x expansion verified (nearly 10x prose expansion on February 2, two days prior to nomination); article is long enough; article is written neutrally; QPQ verified; [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Aztec+thrush&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 no copyvio found]. Good to go! Suggest using main hook rather than alt1 as it gives the necessary context to understand why the 100-year discrepancy is interesting. The [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aztec_Thrush_(Ridgwayia_pinicola)_in_tree.jpg article's main picture] is verified under CC BY-SA 2.0 so it can be used to supplement the hook if desired {{smiley}} ~ [[User:Cyclonebiskit|Cyclonebiskit]] ([[User talk:Cyclonebiskit|chat]]) 18:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 18:40, 4 February 2017
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Aztec thrush
- ... that the Aztec thrush, a vagrant to the United States, was first recorded there more than 100 years after the bird was described? Sources: "Turdus pinicola, sp. nov." published in 1859; "At 11:20 A.M. on August 21, 1977, a baffling thrush-like bird was discovered by Mlmi Hoppe Wolf near Boot Spring in the Chisos Mountains of Big Bend National Park, Texas ... To our knowledge, this is the first occurrence of the Aztec Thrush in the United States" "First record of an Aztec Thrush in the United States"
- ALT1:... that the Aztec thrush was first recorded in the United States in 1977, more than 100 years after the bird was described in 1859?
- Reviewed: Pompeii Lakshmi
5x expanded by Gulumeemee (talk). Self-nominated at 03:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC).
5x expansion verified (nearly 10x prose expansion on February 2, two days prior to nomination); article is long enough; article is written neutrally; QPQ verified; no copyvio found. Good to go! Suggest using main hook rather than alt1 as it gives the necessary context to understand why the 100-year discrepancy is interesting. The article's main picture is verified under CC BY-SA 2.0 so it can be used to supplement the hook if desired
~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 18:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)