Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Babette's"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maile66
(Nomination passes)
imported>Maile66
(Copyedit (minor))
Line 48: Line 48:
 
:<u>Tools</u>
 
:<u>Tools</u>
 
:*Earwig's Copyvio Detector returns "false positive" in that it flagged listed sources as copyvios.
 
:*Earwig's Copyvio Detector returns "false positive" in that it flagged listed sources as copyvios.
:*Labs Dup Detector is not currently not functional.
+
:*Labs Dup Detector is currently not functional.
 
:*Dab solver (Disambig links tool) says there are no disambiguation links in the article
 
:*Dab solver (Disambig links tool) says there are no disambiguation links in the article
 
:*Checklinks showed no external link issues.
 
:*Checklinks showed no external link issues.

Revision as of 21:12, 18 August 2016

Babette's

  • ... that police always tipped off the owner of Babette's Supper Club before they raided the illegal casino in the back, and gamblers escaped through a trap door in the horse-betting room?
  • ALT1 ... that police always tipped off the owner of Babette's Supper Club before they raided its illegal backroom casino, and gamblers escaped through a trap door?

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk) and We hope (talk). Nominated by Yoninah (talk) at 18:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Comment only Shorter ALT1 added. Edwardx (talk) 22:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping thank you. But I think it's important to add "in the back", so I did. Yoninah (talk) 23:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks Yoninah. I should have read the article first! By "in the back", I had wrongly inferred that the police came in the back way, whereas the illegal casino itself was in the back room. But, that does mean that there is ambiguity. Perhaps "before they raided its backroom illegal casino". "Backroom" appears to be an okay word, at least in American English. What do you think? Edwardx (talk) 00:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
  • The power of collaborative editing! Edwardx (talk) 10:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Template:Od

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. Yoninah (talk) 00:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Review by Maile
QPQ
  • QPQ provided
Eligibility
  • Article created by Dr. Blofeld on August 4, 2016 has 4118 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
  • Article is NPOV, currently stable, no dispute tags
Sourcing
  • Every paragraph sourced inline
  • Citations are appropriately formatted
  • No bare URLs
Hook
  • Hook is interesting and "hooky"
  • ALT1 is 153 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
Image
  • No image used in the hook.
Tools
  • Earwig's Copyvio Detector returns "false positive" in that it flagged listed sources as copyvios.
  • Labs Dup Detector is currently not functional.
  • Dab solver (Disambig links tool) says there are no disambiguation links in the article
  • Checklinks showed no external link issues.

Symbol confirmed.svg Nomination passes. — Maile (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)