Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Bad Pharma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mandarax m (Include parentheses in italics per rule F4) |
imported>Gobonobo (passes) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] I wasn't familiar with the turn of phrase "unpick the claims". This is a great article; and very thorough. Date, 5x expansion and hook all check out. Offline reference accepted in good faith. The image appears in the article and is freely licensed, suitable and relevant. This is good to go. |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:48, 24 October 2012
Bad Pharma
- ... that Dr. Ben Goldacre (pictured) argues in Bad Pharma that "medicine is broken," because the evidence on which it is based is systematically distorted by the pharmaceutical industry?
- Reviewed: St Eata's Church, Atcham
- Comment: Expanded fivefold on October 18 from 1595 to 8182 characters
Created/expanded by SlimVirgin (talk). Self nom at 18:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)