Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Baila esta cumbia"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(hook fact; sourcing; QPQ)
imported>Fuebaey
(stale nomination?)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, well referenced. No close paraphrasing seen in English-language hooks. While the first fact in the hook ("one of Selena's biggest hit singles") is verified and cited inline, the second fact about the charting isn't mentioned or cited in the article. Also, the information about [[Veridia]] performing the song doesn't appear in Footnote 12.
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, well referenced. No close paraphrasing seen in English-language hooks. While the first fact in the hook ("one of Selena's biggest hit singles") is verified and cited inline, the second fact about the charting isn't mentioned or cited in the article. Also, the information about [[Veridia]] performing the song doesn't appear in Footnote 12.
 
:*The QPQ that was submitted for this article wasn't a full review; I can't believe it passed. Would you kindly submit another QPQ review based on the DYK criteria listed in the [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide| DYK Reviewing guide]]? Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 
:*The QPQ that was submitted for this article wasn't a full review; I can't believe it passed. Would you kindly submit another QPQ review based on the DYK criteria listed in the [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide| DYK Reviewing guide]]? Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 +
:::{{re|AJona1992}} It's been a week since this was last reviewed but no movement has been made on this nomination. Are you still working on this or should I tag this as stale? [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 12:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 12:06, 24 November 2014

Baila esta cumbia

5x expanded by AJona1992 (talk). Self nominated at 21:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC).

  • By "impacted a music chart", do you mean, "hit the charts"??? EEng (talk) 05:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Yes that's what I meant. Best, .jonatalk 18:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
If it never hit the charts, how can it be one of her biggest hit singles? EEng (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
The song was played on radio stations that never played her songs, which gave more exposure for her and her band. It is named by music critics as her best top single, despite it never entering a music chart. A hit single does not mean a song must enter a music chart, it can be a variety of factors. Best, .jonatalk 20:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Well, I suggest the hook be rewritten to either avoid this apparent contradiction, or make it clear it's a "teaser", lest readers be too puzzled. And I suggest you avoid the word impact. EEng (talk) 21:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Outdent

  • Hows this one? Best, .jonatalk 23:14, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 :) EEng (talk) 02:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed now that hook discussion is over. Note: I changed "was" to "has been" in ALT2. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:06, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, well referenced. No close paraphrasing seen in English-language hooks. While the first fact in the hook ("one of Selena's biggest hit singles") is verified and cited inline, the second fact about the charting isn't mentioned or cited in the article. Also, the information about Veridia performing the song doesn't appear in Footnote 12.
  • The QPQ that was submitted for this article wasn't a full review; I can't believe it passed. Would you kindly submit another QPQ review based on the DYK criteria listed in the DYK Reviewing guide? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Template:Re It's been a week since this was last reviewed but no movement has been made on this nomination. Are you still working on this or should I tag this as stale? Fuebaey (talk) 12:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)