Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Baker Run, Windfall Run"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>LavaBaron
m
imported>Yoninah
(hook fact, question)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
::*{{ping|LavaBaron}} I spoke to {{u|Yoninah}} [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Question|here]]; {{they|Yoninah}} was okay with the articles being a few days late. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 18:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 
::*{{ping|LavaBaron}} I spoke to {{u|Yoninah}} [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Question|here]]; {{they|Yoninah}} was okay with the articles being a few days late. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 18:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] That's, of course, absolutely fine with me. Naturally I would have just passed this on first review since it's so close to the line but a similar courtesy I extended to another editor this week was cited as cause for my "final warning" and topic ban by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]]. You'll understand if my reviews have to meet an extra standard of perfection since I'm editing with another editor holding a gun to my head. I apologize for the inconvenience this has caused you (among other editors here, and elsewhere, over a period of many months). [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 18:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] That's, of course, absolutely fine with me. Naturally I would have just passed this on first review since it's so close to the line but a similar courtesy I extended to another editor this week was cited as cause for my "final warning" and topic ban by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]]. You'll understand if my reviews have to meet an extra standard of perfection since I'm editing with another editor holding a gun to my head. I apologize for the inconvenience this has caused you (among other editors here, and elsewhere, over a period of many months). [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 18:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 +
:::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|LavaBaron}}, this review in no way constitutes an "extra standard of perfection". After so many notices and warnings, could you at least specifically list the criteria that you checked? Other DYK reviewers are doing it everyday without complaint. You could, too.
 +
:::::*Since I answered Jakec on the DYK talk page, I was planning to review this myself. Here is my review:
 +
:::::*[[Baker Run]]: New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. I have a question, though, as to why in the lead, Baker Run is "also called" Windfall Run, and why [[Windfall Run]] is not linked in the article (it is, in the infobox). I also would like to know where to look in footnote 1 to find the exact measurement of each stream?
 +
:::::*[[Windfall Run]]: New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. I'm not sure how to check the hook fact on the National Map Viewer, as above. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 17:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 17:28, 24 October 2015

Baker Run, Windfall Run

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 23:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg By relying on the National Map Viewer as a source, which requires the user manipulate an interface of greater complexity than a search bar, this may skirt the line of OR, however, other sources referenced in the article, even if not cited to the hook, are good enough to establish its veracity. Nonetheless, both articles appear to have been moved to mainspace more than 7 days ago; so I'll hold for further explanation from Jakec. This nom has been reviewed against, and determined to meet, the seven criterions of a DYK nomination, except where described otherwise. This review is written to the standards described in the Reviewing Guide which requires an icon and a description of issues discovered. Having (a) placed an icon, and, (b) described only the discovered issues, it is complete pending comment. This is not a QPQ review. LavaBaron (talk) 17:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg That's, of course, absolutely fine with me. Naturally I would have just passed this on first review since it's so close to the line but a similar courtesy I extended to another editor this week was cited as cause for my "final warning" and topic ban by BlueMoonset. You'll understand if my reviews have to meet an extra standard of perfection since I'm editing with another editor holding a gun to my head. I apologize for the inconvenience this has caused you (among other editors here, and elsewhere, over a period of many months). LavaBaron (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Template:Ping, this review in no way constitutes an "extra standard of perfection". After so many notices and warnings, could you at least specifically list the criteria that you checked? Other DYK reviewers are doing it everyday without complaint. You could, too.
  • Since I answered Jakec on the DYK talk page, I was planning to review this myself. Here is my review:
  • Baker Run: New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. I have a question, though, as to why in the lead, Baker Run is "also called" Windfall Run, and why Windfall Run is not linked in the article (it is, in the infobox). I also would like to know where to look in footnote 1 to find the exact measurement of each stream?
  • Windfall Run: New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. I'm not sure how to check the hook fact on the National Map Viewer, as above. Yoninah (talk) 17:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)