Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Barbara Newman"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Victuallers
(oops)
imported>Altenmaeren
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Can we improve the balance in this article. She seems to be a brilliant person with a brilliant book. Is there not someone who doesn't agree with this religious historian (or does she not tackle controversy?) :-) Oh and can it be used for Womens History Month when approved? [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 00:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Can we improve the balance in this article. She seems to be a brilliant person with a brilliant book. Is there not someone who doesn't agree with this religious historian (or does she not tackle controversy?) :-) Oh and can it be used for Womens History Month when approved? [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 00:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
* thanks for having a look! I'm trying to find some controversy, but it's surprisingly hard -- I guess if she were a theologian it would be different. There was a conference she organized a few years back on Goddesses that might've had some controversy. Anyhow, yes, I'd love to have this be a part of women's history month if I can get it approved. [[User:Altenmaeren|Altenmaeren]] ([[User talk:Altenmaeren|talk]]) 19:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 19:02, 12 February 2015

Barbara Newman

Created by Altenmaeren (talk). Self nominated at 12:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Can we improve the balance in this article. She seems to be a brilliant person with a brilliant book. Is there not someone who doesn't agree with this religious historian (or does she not tackle controversy?) :-) Oh and can it be used for Womens History Month when approved? Victuallers (talk) 00:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • thanks for having a look! I'm trying to find some controversy, but it's surprisingly hard -- I guess if she were a theologian it would be different. There was a conference she organized a few years back on Goddesses that might've had some controversy. Anyhow, yes, I'd love to have this be a part of women's history month if I can get it approved. Altenmaeren (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)