Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Baseball Rule"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Case
(re to Yoninah, suggest more ALTs)
imported>Yoninah
(restoring tick)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
::::{{replyto|Yoninah}} Fine; I thought that one was a stretch anyway, although it ''would'' have gotten clicks.<p>Having expanded the article some more, I have some new suggestions:
 
::::{{replyto|Yoninah}} Fine; I thought that one was a stretch anyway, although it ''would'' have gotten clicks.<p>Having expanded the article some more, I have some new suggestions:
 
::::*'''ALT2''':... that in 2013, the [[Idaho Supreme Court]] became the first U.S. state supreme court to reject the '''[[Baseball Rule]]'''? <small>Source: "[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8708555989011778825 We Decline to Adopt the Baseball Rule]", Idaho Supreme Court, ''Rountree v. Boise Baseball Club'', 2013</small>
 
::::*'''ALT2''':... that in 2013, the [[Idaho Supreme Court]] became the first U.S. state supreme court to reject the '''[[Baseball Rule]]'''? <small>Source: "[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8708555989011778825 We Decline to Adopt the Baseball Rule]", Idaho Supreme Court, ''Rountree v. Boise Baseball Club'', 2013</small>
::::*'''ALT3''':... that the '''[[Baseball Rule]]''', protecting teams from [[legal liability|liability]] over foul ball injuries to fans, dates from a 1913 [[Missouri Court of Appeals|Missouri appeals court]] decision? <small> Source: [https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2411&context=tlr A Foul Ball in the Courtroom: The Baseball Spectator Injury in the Courtroom as a Case of First Impression], University of Tulsa Law Review, Spring 2003, pp. 496–7: "The decision in ''Crane'' announced the existence of a limited but unwaiveable duty, and at the same time offered ballpark owners clear directions as to how to satisfy their obligations."</small> [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 02:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
+
::::*'''ALT3''':<s>... that the '''[[Baseball Rule]]''', protecting teams from [[legal liability|liability]] over foul ball injuries to fans, dates from a 1913 [[Missouri Court of Appeals|Missouri appeals court]] decision?</s> <small> Source: [https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2411&context=tlr A Foul Ball in the Courtroom: The Baseball Spectator Injury in the Courtroom as a Case of First Impression], University of Tulsa Law Review, Spring 2003, pp. 496–7: "The decision in ''Crane'' announced the existence of a limited but unwaiveable duty, and at the same time offered ballpark owners clear directions as to how to satisfy their obligations."</small> [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 02:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 +
:::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]{{ping|Daniel Case}} Thank you. But do you have a source for it being the first US state supreme court to do so? I'd rather go ahead with ALT0, which explains the law a bit, although I would change "usually" to "generally". Restoring tick for ALT0 per Cwmhiraeth's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 11:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 11:23, 26 March 2019

Baseball Rule

  • Reviewed: Eleanor Barrow Chase
  • Comment: I am aiming to have this on the Main Page on U.S. Major League Baseball Opening Day this year, March 28. As I type this I am still developing the article, so it may be possible that material supportive of other hooks will be added

Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 04:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg This impressive article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral and I don't believe there are any copyright issues (Earwig is down). A QPQ has been done. Creator requests this for March 28th. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:Replyto Fine; I thought that one was a stretch anyway, although it would have gotten clicks.

Having expanded the article some more, I have some new suggestions:

  • Symbol confirmed.svgTemplate:Ping Thank you. But do you have a source for it being the first US state supreme court to do so? I'd rather go ahead with ALT0, which explains the law a bit, although I would change "usually" to "generally". Restoring tick for ALT0 per Cwmhiraeth's review. Yoninah (talk) 11:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)