Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Basil Cardew"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Philafrenzy
(CE)
imported>Philafrenzy
(CE)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article is long and new enough with no copyright violations. I think that the original hook is the most interesting, but the second part isn't actually in the article. I'm not sure that Family Search is considered a reliable source. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 00:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article is long and new enough with no copyright violations. I think that the original hook is the most interesting, but the second part isn't actually in the article. I'm not sure that Family Search is considered a reliable source. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 00:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
:::Thanks. The second part of the first hook was based on a paraphrasing of the quote in the article, "one of the most outstanding motoring writers of the day". Family Search contains both unreliable elements (user-generated family histories) and reliable ones (transcriptions and copies of official records). In this case it is a photographic copy a Brazilian government immigration card [[File:Basil Ivor Denton Cardew Cartões de Imigração 1946.jpg|thumb]] so I think we are quite safe with that. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 05:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
+
:::Thanks. The second part of the first hook was based on a paraphrasing of the quote in the article, "one of the most outstanding motoring writers of the day". Family Search contains both unreliable elements (user-generated family histories) and reliable ones (transcriptions and copies of official records). In this case it is a photographic copy a Brazilian government immigration card (see [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Basil_Ivor_Denton_Cardew_Cart%C3%B5es_de_Imigra%C3%A7%C3%A3o_1946.jpg here]) so I think we are quite safe with that. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 05:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 05:34, 5 December 2018

Basil Cardew

  • ... that Basil Cardew, whose father was killed in a road accident, became one of the pre-eminent motoring journalists in Britain?
    • ALT1:... that British motoring journalist Basil Cardew, owned a camel hair coat, a "rakish trilby" hat, and was a "lavish spender of his paper's expenses"?

Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 18:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg The article is long and new enough with no copyright violations. I think that the original hook is the most interesting, but the second part isn't actually in the article. I'm not sure that Family Search is considered a reliable source. SL93 (talk) 00:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. The second part of the first hook was based on a paraphrasing of the quote in the article, "one of the most outstanding motoring writers of the day". Family Search contains both unreliable elements (user-generated family histories) and reliable ones (transcriptions and copies of official records). In this case it is a photographic copy a Brazilian government immigration card (see here) so I think we are quite safe with that. Philafrenzy (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)