Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Malvern Hill"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ceradon m (add reviewed.) |
imported>IgnorantArmies (good to go) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Expanded 5x, easily long enough. Article is well-written, and I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the numerous sources employed. Hook's fine length-wise (I'd go with the first one), and cited (see [[Battle of Malvern Hill#Reactions and effects|§5.4]]). QPQ all sorted, all images are public domain, as you'd expect on a 19th-century topic. Brilliant work, {{ping|Ceradon}}, it's certainly no mean feat to expand a ten-year-old article fivefold, let alone to this sort of standard, and you should definitely considering taking it to GAN, at a minimum. (For what it's worth, I discovered quite recently that Thomas Cocke, who built the original [[Malvern Hill]], is a very, very distant ancestor of mine, which is why this article leapt out at me.) <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:IgnorantArmies|<font color="crimson">IgnorantArmies</font>]]'''</small> 16:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 4 January 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Battle of Malvern Hill
- ... that when Confederate officer D.H. Hill described the Battle of Malvern Hill in a post-war publication, he said, "It wasn't war; it was murder"?
- ALT1: "It wasn't war; it was murder," were the words of Confederate officer D.H. Hill when describing the Battle of Malvern Hill.
- Reviewed: Irwin Sherman
5x expanded by Ceradon (talk). Self nominated at 23:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC).
Expanded 5x, easily long enough. Article is well-written, and I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the numerous sources employed. Hook's fine length-wise (I'd go with the first one), and cited (see §5.4). QPQ all sorted, all images are public domain, as you'd expect on a 19th-century topic. Brilliant work, Template:Ping, it's certainly no mean feat to expand a ten-year-old article fivefold, let alone to this sort of standard, and you should definitely considering taking it to GAN, at a minimum. (For what it's worth, I discovered quite recently that Thomas Cocke, who built the original Malvern Hill, is a very, very distant ancestor of mine, which is why this article leapt out at me.) IgnorantArmies 16:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)