Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/BeingGirl"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Trevj (reword hook, per lead change in article) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (OK) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :*<!--Make first comment here--> | + | :*<!--Make first comment here--> [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article is new enough and long enough. I'm happy with its neutrality and would go for the original hook, which is suitably sourced. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 06:44, 22 April 2012
BeingGirl
- ... that internet marketing websites such as BeingGirl can be four times as cost-effective as advertising?
- ALT1:... that P&G promoted their self care website BeingGirl by partnering with Sony BMG and Cathy's Book?
- Reviewed: Croscat
- Comment: I've tried to adopt a neutral point of view in creating this article. If anyone has any concerns, I suggest they be addressed by further editing. Thanks. The ref citing Bernoff for the hook is on page 3 of "Finding direction as Web 2.0 changes".
Created/expanded by Trevj (talk). Self nom at 12:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- 16px This article is new enough and long enough. I'm happy with its neutrality and would go for the original hook, which is suitably sourced. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
