Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/BeingGirl"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492 (to prep 1) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace a deprecated template (*mp)) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
====BeingGirl==== | ====BeingGirl==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=BeingGirl|BeingGirl}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=BeingGirl|BeingGirl}} | ||
| − | + | *... that [[internet marketing]] websites such as '''[[BeingGirl]]''' can be four times as cost-effective as advertising? | |
:*'''ALT1''':... that [[Procter & Gamble|P&G]] promoted their [[self care]] website '''[[BeingGirl]]''' by partnering with [[Sony BMG]] and ''[[Cathy's Book]]''? | :*'''ALT1''':... that [[Procter & Gamble|P&G]] promoted their [[self care]] website '''[[BeingGirl]]''' by partnering with [[Sony BMG]] and ''[[Cathy's Book]]''? | ||
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Croscat|Croscat]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Croscat|Croscat]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:38, 5 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
BeingGirl
- ... that internet marketing websites such as BeingGirl can be four times as cost-effective as advertising?
- ALT1:... that P&G promoted their self care website BeingGirl by partnering with Sony BMG and Cathy's Book?
- Reviewed: Croscat
- Comment: I've tried to adopt a neutral point of view in creating this article. If anyone has any concerns, I suggest they be addressed by further editing. Thanks. The ref citing Bernoff for the hook is on page 3 of "Finding direction as Web 2.0 changes".
Created/expanded by Trevj (talk). Self nom at 12:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. I'm happy with its neutrality and would go for the original hook, which is suitably sourced. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
