Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Benedictine Vulgate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Johnbod ({{subst:DYKno}} Ineligible - mostly a spin-off from Vulgate, with the starting material not expanded x 5.) |
imported>BlueMoonset (closing as ineligible; most of the material was copied from Vulgate rather than newly written) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations from March 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | + | The result was: '''rejected''' by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)<br /> | |
+ | Not eligible as bulk of article contents copied in a fork from [[Vulgate]]; DYK-nominated articles must be newly written material or the copied material expanded fivefold, which this was not. | ||
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|Benedictine Vulgate}} | {{DYK header|Benedictine Vulgate}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Benedictine Vulgate|Benedictine Vulgate}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Benedictine Vulgate|Benedictine Vulgate}} | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
− | {{main page image|image=Benedictine Vulgate (Biblia sacra iuxta Latinam vulgatam versionem ad codicum fidem) - Vol. 1 (Genesis), title.jpg|caption=Title page of the first volume of the Benedictine Vulgate, 1926|width=120 | + | {{main page image|image=Benedictine Vulgate (Biblia sacra iuxta Latinam vulgatam versionem ad codicum fidem) - Vol. 1 (Genesis), title.jpg|caption=Title page of the first volume of the Benedictine Vulgate, 1926|width=120 }} |
− | </div | + | </div> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that it took 88 years of work for the Catholic Church to publish '''[[Benedictine Vulgate|a critical edition of the Vulgate Old Testament]]''', [[Deuterocanonical_books#In_the_Catholic_Church|Catholic deuterocanonical books]] included? <small>Source: "The neaxt year, 1907, saw the inauguration of the Roman Vulgate project, undertaken by Benedictine monks in Rome. This resulted in a major critical edition of Jeroms's Latin Old Testament, along with the apocryphal books, finally completed in 1995." ([https://books.google.be/books?id=CXQqCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA74&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=1907&f=false The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts], p. 132)</small> | * ... that it took 88 years of work for the Catholic Church to publish '''[[Benedictine Vulgate|a critical edition of the Vulgate Old Testament]]''', [[Deuterocanonical_books#In_the_Catholic_Church|Catholic deuterocanonical books]] included? <small>Source: "The neaxt year, 1907, saw the inauguration of the Roman Vulgate project, undertaken by Benedictine monks in Rome. This resulted in a major critical edition of Jeroms's Latin Old Testament, along with the apocryphal books, finally completed in 1995." ([https://books.google.be/books?id=CXQqCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA74&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=1907&f=false The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts], p. 132)</small> | ||
:* | :* | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Veverve|Veverve]] ([[User talk:Veverve|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Veverve|Veverve]] ([[User talk:Veverve|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | :* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Ineligible - mostly a spin-off from [[Vulgate]], with the starting material not expanded x 5. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 21:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 15:24, 31 March 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 15:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Not eligible as bulk of article contents copied in a fork from Vulgate; DYK-nominated articles must be newly written material or the copied material expanded fivefold, which this was not.
DYK toolbox |
---|
Benedictine Vulgate
- ... that it took 88 years of work for the Catholic Church to publish a critical edition of the Vulgate Old Testament, Catholic deuterocanonical books included? Source: "The neaxt year, 1907, saw the inauguration of the Roman Vulgate project, undertaken by Benedictine monks in Rome. This resulted in a major critical edition of Jeroms's Latin Old Testament, along with the apocryphal books, finally completed in 1995." (The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts, p. 132)
Created by Veverve (talk). Self-nominated at 19:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC).