Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Edwardx (reply) |
imported>Storye book (GTG) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::*Sure, either one works. [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC) | ::*Sure, either one works. [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::* Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC) | :::* Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. [[Template:Did you know nominations/John C. McManus|this one]]). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above reviews taken on trust. Good to go. --[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 15:46, 3 July 2014
DYK toolbox |
---|
Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden
- ... that the Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden in Beverly Hills, California was dedicated on September 11, 2011 to honor the victims of the September 11 attacks of 2001?
- ALT1 ... that the Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden was dedicated exactly ten years after the September 11 attacks of 2001?
- ALT2 ... that the Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden is centered around a 30-foot bent steel beam from the wreckage of the World Trade Center?
Created by Zigzig20s (talk). Self nominated at 15:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC).
New enough. Long enough. NPOV. Duplication Detector shows no unavoidable close paraphrasing or copyivos when checking the main online sources. Hook is cited and the article is well-cited generally. But, the hook seems verbose and unremarkable, so I've added two ALTs. I prefer ALT2. No QPQ done. Edwardx (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... Edwardx (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. this one). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above reviews taken on trust. Good to go. --Storye book (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)