Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Storye book
(GTG)
imported>Storye book
m (typo)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
::*Sure, either one works. [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 
::*Sure, either one works. [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 
:::* Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 
:::* Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. [[Template:Did you know nominations/John C. McManus|this one]]). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above reviews taken on trust. Good to go. --[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
+
::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. [[Template:Did you know nominations/John C. McManus|this one]]). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above review taken on trust. Good to go. --[[User:Storye book|Storye book]] ([[User talk:Storye book|talk]]) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:47, 3 July 2014

Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden

Created by Zigzig20s (talk). Self nominated at 15:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough. Long enough. NPOV. Duplication Detector shows no unavoidable close paraphrasing or copyivos when checking the main online sources. Hook is cited and the article is well-cited generally. But, the hook seems verbose and unremarkable, so I've added two ALTs. I prefer ALT2. No QPQ done. Edwardx (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Sure, either one works. Zigzig20s (talk) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... Edwardx (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. this one). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above review taken on trust. Good to go. --Storye book (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)