Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Blue Castle Project"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mifter (approve) |
imported>Pppery (Incomplete review) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - Length, Date, and QPQ all check out. The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output. Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - Length, Date, and QPQ all check out. The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output. Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :** [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Mifter}} Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. [[User:Pppery|<span style="position:relative;top:10px">P</span>p<span style="position:relative;bottom:5px">p</span>]][[User talk:Pppery|e<big style="position:relative;top:10px">r</big>y]] 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 21:46, 11 February 2017
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Blue Castle Project
- ... that the Blue Castle Project is a proposed nuclear power plant that will increase Utah's electrical output by 50 percent?
- Reviewed: Léocadia
Created by Nihonjoe (talk). Self-nominated at 00:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC).
- Length, Date, and QPQ all check out. The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output. Best, Mifter (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Template:Ping Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. Pppery 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)