Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Blue Castle Project"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pppery
(Incomplete review)
imported>Mifter
(cmt)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that the '''[[Blue Castle Project]]''' is a proposed [[nuclear power plant]] that will increase [[Utah|Utah's]] electrical output by 50 percent?
+
* ... that the '''[[Blue Castle Project]]''' is a proposed [[nuclear power plant]] that will increase [[Utah|Utah's]] electrical generation capacity by 50 percent?
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Léocadia|Léocadia]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Léocadia|Léocadia]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Nihonjoe|Nihonjoe]] ([[User talk:Nihonjoe|talk]]). Self-nominated at 00:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Nihonjoe|Nihonjoe]] ([[User talk:Nihonjoe|talk]]). Self-nominated at 00:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC).</small>
Line 20: Line 20:
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - Length, Date, and QPQ all check out.  The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output.  Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - Length, Date, and QPQ all check out.  The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output.  Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:** [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Mifter}}  Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. [[User:Pppery|<span style="position:relative;top:10px">P</span>p<span style="position:relative;bottom:5px">p</span>]][[User talk:Pppery|e<big style="position:relative;top:10px">r</big>y]] 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:** [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Mifter}}  Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. [[User:Pppery|<span style="position:relative;top:10px">P</span>p<span style="position:relative;bottom:5px">p</span>]][[User talk:Pppery|e<big style="position:relative;top:10px">r</big>y]] 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 +
:::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - The copyvio check was performed and cleared with the review (in the future I will note it explicitly) and the hook length is also fine.  Also, for future refernce, while text does make it difficult to convey and interpret emotion, saying something along the lines "not some minutia to gloss over like you did" is very easy to interpret as being condensing (though I assume it was not your intent to come across as such).  Concerning the ref, I have modified the hook to mention capacity as the ref documents.  Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 22:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:00, 11 February 2017

Blue Castle Project

Created by Nihonjoe (talk). Self-nominated at 00:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg - Length, Date, and QPQ all check out. The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output. Best, Mifter (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Symbol question.svg Template:Ping Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. Pppery 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg - The copyvio check was performed and cleared with the review (in the future I will note it explicitly) and the hook length is also fine. Also, for future refernce, while text does make it difficult to convey and interpret emotion, saying something along the lines "not some minutia to gloss over like you did" is very easy to interpret as being condensing (though I assume it was not your intent to come across as such). Concerning the ref, I have modified the hook to mention capacity as the ref documents. Best, Mifter (talk) 22:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)