Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Blue Castle Project"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>HalfGig
(prep 4)
imported>Jonesey95
m (Fix Linter errors using AutoEd)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
 
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
  
The result was: '''promoted''' by  [[User:HalfGig|<font color="darkolivegreen">'''HalfGig'''</font>]] [[User talk:HalfGig|<font color="orangered">'''talk'''</font>]] 03:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)<br />
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by  [[User:HalfGig|<span style="color:darkolivegreen;">'''HalfGig'''</span>]] [[User talk:HalfGig|<span style="color:orangered;">'''talk'''</span>]] 03:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Blue Castle Project====
 
====Blue Castle Project====
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - Length, Date, and QPQ all check out.  The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output.  Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - Length, Date, and QPQ all check out.  The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output.  Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
:***{{reply|Mifter}} <s>That is a direct quote, which is what is used in the article in the first paragraph in the [[Blue Castle Project#Initial project|Initial project section]]: "increase Utah's electrical capacity by approximately 50 percent". Perhaps I'm missing something, but I'm not seeing the concern here. The word "output" is not used in the article at all as far as I can tell.</s> ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WP Japan</font>]]!</small> 18:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
+
:***{{reply|Mifter}} <s>That is a direct quote, which is what is used in the article in the first paragraph in the [[Blue Castle Project#Initial project|Initial project section]]: "increase Utah's electrical capacity by approximately 50 percent". Perhaps I'm missing something, but I'm not seeing the concern here. The word "output" is not used in the article at all as far as I can tell.</s> ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WP Japan</span>]]!</small> 18:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:** [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Mifter}}  Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. [[User:Pppery|<span style="position:relative;top:10px">P</span>p<span style="position:relative;bottom:5px">p</span>]][[User talk:Pppery|e<big style="position:relative;top:10px">r</big>y]] 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:** [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Mifter}}  Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. [[User:Pppery|<span style="position:relative;top:10px">P</span>p<span style="position:relative;bottom:5px">p</span>]][[User talk:Pppery|e<big style="position:relative;top:10px">r</big>y]] 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:***[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - The copyvio check was performed and cleared with the review (in the future I will note it explicitly) and the hook length is also fine.  Also, for future reference, while text does make it difficult to convey and interpret emotion, saying something along the lines "not some minutia to gloss over like you did" is very easy to interpret as being condescending (though I assume it was not your intent to come across as such).  Concerning the ref, I have modified the hook to mention capacity as the ref documents.  Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 22:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:***[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] - The copyvio check was performed and cleared with the review (in the future I will note it explicitly) and the hook length is also fine.  Also, for future reference, while text does make it difficult to convey and interpret emotion, saying something along the lines "not some minutia to gloss over like you did" is very easy to interpret as being condescending (though I assume it was not your intent to come across as such).  Concerning the ref, I have modified the hook to mention capacity as the ref documents.  Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 22:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
:****{{reply|Mifter}} Ah, you meant in the hook. Okay, I can see that. Thanks for catching that. Any other concerns, or are we good to go? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WP Japan</font>]]!</small> 18:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
+
:****{{reply|Mifter}} Ah, you meant in the hook. Okay, I can see that. Thanks for catching that. Any other concerns, or are we good to go? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WP Japan</span>]]!</small> 18:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:*****Nope, all set, the hook is approved and should be promoted and run in a few days.  [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 00:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:*****Nope, all set, the hook is approved and should be promoted and run in a few days.  [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 00:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
:******Alright, sounds good. Thanks! ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkgreen">日本穣</font>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">投稿</font>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<font color="maroon">Join WP Japan</font>]]!</small> 00:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:******Alright, sounds good. Thanks! ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WP Japan</span>]]!</small> 00:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 01:24, 25 June 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 03:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Blue Castle Project

Created by Nihonjoe (talk). Self-nominated at 00:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg - Length, Date, and QPQ all check out. The cite for the 50% increase was behind a Law 360 paywall but I have access to Law 360 and was able to confirm the citation - NB that the cite states this will increase the capacity 50% which while very similar is not the exact same as output. Best, Mifter (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
      • Template:Reply That is a direct quote, which is what is used in the article in the first paragraph in the Initial project section: "increase Utah's electrical capacity by approximately 50 percent". Perhaps I'm missing something, but I'm not seeing the concern here. The word "output" is not used in the article at all as far as I can tell. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Symbol question.svg Template:Ping Your review is incomplete. It does not mention a copyvio check, or the hook length, etc. Also, what you are saying about capacity vs. output seems like it makes the hook inaccurate, not some minutia to gloss over like you did. Pppery 21:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
      • Symbol confirmed.svg - The copyvio check was performed and cleared with the review (in the future I will note it explicitly) and the hook length is also fine. Also, for future reference, while text does make it difficult to convey and interpret emotion, saying something along the lines "not some minutia to gloss over like you did" is very easy to interpret as being condescending (though I assume it was not your intent to come across as such). Concerning the ref, I have modified the hook to mention capacity as the ref documents. Best, Mifter (talk) 22:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)