Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Boletus auripes, Boletus regius"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Rcej (←Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = Boletus auripes | article2 = Boletus regius | hook = ... that the '''[[Boletus auripes|butter-f...') |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (OK) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :*<!--Make first comment here--> | + | :*<!--Make first comment here--> [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] One of these articles is a five-fold expansion and the other is new. They are both new enough and long enough for DYK. The sources are mostly books and not online and the hook fact is therefore accepted in good faith. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 10:20, 3 September 2012
Boletus auripes, Boletus regius
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Boletus auripes
- Boletus regius )
- ... that the butter-foot bolete (pictured) and red-capped butter bolete are in the same section?"
Created/expanded by Sasata (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 07:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
One of these articles is a five-fold expansion and the other is new. They are both new enough and long enough for DYK. The sources are mostly books and not online and the hook fact is therefore accepted in good faith. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
