Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Boletus auripes, Boletus regius"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (OK) |
imported>Mandarax m (Add subpage parameter to {{DYKmake}}) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*{{DYKmake|Boletus auripes|Sasata|subpage=Boletus auripes, Boletus regius}} | *{{DYKmake|Boletus auripes|Sasata|subpage=Boletus auripes, Boletus regius}} | ||
*{{DYKnom|Boletus auripes|Rcej}} | *{{DYKnom|Boletus auripes|Rcej}} | ||
| − | *{{DYKmake|Boletus regius|Sasata}} | + | *{{DYKmake|Boletus regius|Sasata|subpage=Boletus auripes, Boletus regius}} |
*{{DYKnom|Boletus regius|Rcej}} | *{{DYKnom|Boletus regius|Rcej}} | ||
--> | --> | ||
Revision as of 09:19, 4 September 2012
Boletus auripes, Boletus regius
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Boletus auripes
- Boletus regius )
- ... that the butter-foot bolete (pictured) and red-capped butter bolete are in the same section?"
Created/expanded by Sasata (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 07:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
One of these articles is a five-fold expansion and the other is new. They are both new enough and long enough for DYK. The sources are mostly books and not online and the hook fact is therefore accepted in good faith. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
