Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Boomerang effect (psychology)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Maile66 (this is 5X expanded) |
imported>Maile66 |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
[[User:Peabunny|Peabunny]] ([[User talk:Peabunny|talk]]) 01:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC) | [[User:Peabunny|Peabunny]] ([[User talk:Peabunny|talk]]) 01:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed. The above reviewer is indefinitely blocked. For the record, DYK says this article was at 5X expansion on the date of its nomination. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 16:48, 14 December 2013 (UTC) | + | *<s>[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed. The above reviewer is indefinitely blocked. For the record, DYK says this article was at 5X expansion on the date of its nomination. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 16:48, 14 December 2013 (UTC)</s> |
| + | ::Apparently, the reviewer has been unblocked. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 23:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:41, 27 December 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Boomerang effect (psychology)
- ... that a persuasive message that creates an attitude change in the opposite intended direction is called a boomerang effect?
Expanded by Peabunny (talk). Self nominated at 10:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC).
-
- The expansion doesn't seem to be x5. My calculation is 14312 / 3817 = 3.75.
- There are many paragraphs without citations.
- The English seems weak. For example, the word intension in the lead seems to be a misspelling of intention.
- Andrew Davidson (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Andrew for the feedback and comments.
- I have corrected the misspelled intension.
- Regarding the calculation, the last 13996 and 2803 are both edited by me. I just realized that the edition I submitted earlier was not right and corrected it yesterday. so the calculation might be instead 14312 / (3817-2803) = 14 ish.
- Regarding the reference. I think there might be some issue with my ref editing. I noticed that user Mandarax has been helping to correct the ref mistakes in wiki editing.
I will keep correcting the wiki syntax. Thank you again for the comment and please let me know if there is more I can do.