Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Boxwood Altar (WB.232)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (superseding "again" icon; adding a bit more at the end) |
imported>Evrik |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] {{ping|Ceoil|Cwmhiraeth}} - I suggest we either give a pass on the QPQs or veto this nomination. If no one objects, I would give it a final approval myself. --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 16:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] {{ping|Ceoil|Cwmhiraeth}} - I suggest we either give a pass on the QPQs or veto this nomination. If no one objects, I would give it a final approval myself. --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 16:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] [[User:evrik|evrik]], since we currently have 141 of 332 active DYK nominations waiting for approval, I would be opposed to giving a pass on QPQs. Two valid QPQs are needed, whether from [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] or ones donated by someone else. Let's leave the ultimate approval of this to the original reviewer, [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], though Ceoil should take action soon. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:34, 2 December 2019 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] [[User:evrik|evrik]], since we currently have 141 of 332 active DYK nominations waiting for approval, I would be opposed to giving a pass on QPQs. Two valid QPQs are needed, whether from [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] or ones donated by someone else. Let's leave the ultimate approval of this to the original reviewer, [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], though Ceoil should take action soon. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:34, 2 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::I will donate [[Template:Did you know nominations/Fountain of the Canals of the Pear Tree]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/Wacław Brzeziński]]. --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 17:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 17:43, 2 December 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Boxwood Altar (WB.232), Adam Dircksz
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Boxwood Altar (WB.232)
- Adam Dircksz )
- ... that the 1511 miniature altar in the British Museum, sometimes attributed to Adam Dircksz, is the only surviving Gothic boxwood miniature to have been ascribed a date by its artist? Source: Wixom, William D. "A Brabantine Boxwood Triptych". Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts, Vol. 61, No. 1/2, Summer 1983. JSTOR i23182569Template:Only in print, p. 42
Created by Ceoil (talk). Self-nominated at 02:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC).
- Reviewed: Christ Mocked, Air Balloon (pub)
These two articles are new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the articles are neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. Template:Ping There is an incomplete sentence in the "Triptychs" section of Boxwood Altar (WB.232) and you need to do two QPQs. Would you like to add an image to the nomination, the detailed sculpture is amazing? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Cwmhiraeth: have added the image (yes it is amazing)...will copy-edit further and complete the QPQ's. Thanks. Ceoil (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- QPQs and copyedits done, but thinking of adding a third article. Will add an ALT hook. Ceoil (talk) 19:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ceoil, you did not add the article and the final date for doing so would have been November 2. It being November 14, it is unfortunately far too late to add it now, and a 5x expansion would be prohibitive. Perhaps it could eventually become a GA and be nominated that way. Cwmhiraeth, is this nomination ready for approval, or is there more work to be done? BlueMoonset (talk) 22:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
These two articles meet the DYK criteria, the image is appropriately licensed. This would be good to go, but neither of the two QPQs you mention above is a proper review, both are just passing comments. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping - I suggest we either give a pass on the QPQs or veto this nomination. If no one objects, I would give it a final approval myself. --evrik (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
evrik, since we currently have 141 of 332 active DYK nominations waiting for approval, I would be opposed to giving a pass on QPQs. Two valid QPQs are needed, whether from Ceoil or ones donated by someone else. Let's leave the ultimate approval of this to the original reviewer, Cwmhiraeth, though Ceoil should take action soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:34, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- I will donate Template:Did you know nominations/Fountain of the Canals of the Pear Tree and Template:Did you know nominations/Wacław Brzeziński. --evrik (talk) 17:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
