Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Bromhead Memorial"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>HJ Mitchell (+) |
imported>Michael Barera (GTG AGF) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] This article is new enough, long enough (over 3,900 characters), and within core policy requirements: it is neutral, well supported with inline citations (although two are to books to which I do not have access, so I am accepting them in good faith), and free of any apparent copyright issues (the reproductions of the actual inscriptions on the memorial obviously don't count). The hook is short enough, properly formatted, interesting enough, properly referenced with an inline citation, and neutral. Also, [[Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth B|QPQ has been done]], and the [[:File:Bromhead memorial with wreaths.jpg|image selected for the hook]] is freely licensed under the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en CC BY-SA 4.0], appears in the article, and shows up reasonably well at small size. All in all, I think that this article is good to go (again accepting the book sources in good faith). Nice work! [[User:Michael Barera|Michael Barera]] ([[User talk:Michael Barera|talk]]) 00:55, 11 January 2016 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 00:55, 11 January 2016
DYK toolbox |
---|
Bromhead Memorial
- ... that the Bromhead Memorial (pictured) commemorates 307 ex-servicemen who died at the Royal Star and Garter Home in Richmond, London?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth B
Created by HJ Mitchell (talk). Self-nominated at 23:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC).
This article is new enough, long enough (over 3,900 characters), and within core policy requirements: it is neutral, well supported with inline citations (although two are to books to which I do not have access, so I am accepting them in good faith), and free of any apparent copyright issues (the reproductions of the actual inscriptions on the memorial obviously don't count). The hook is short enough, properly formatted, interesting enough, properly referenced with an inline citation, and neutral. Also, QPQ has been done, and the image selected for the hook is freely licensed under the CC BY-SA 4.0, appears in the article, and shows up reasonably well at small size. All in all, I think that this article is good to go (again accepting the book sources in good faith). Nice work! Michael Barera (talk) 00:55, 11 January 2016 (UTC)