Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Bruce Cooper"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cdtew
(Added sig to review)
imported>Lord Roem
(to prep 3)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2012
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by '''[[User:Lord Roem|Lord Roem]]''' ~ ([[User talk:Lord Roem|talk]]) 03:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====Bruce Cooper, Gibraltar Caving Group====
 
====Bruce Cooper, Gibraltar Caving Group====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Bruce Cooper|Bruce Cooper|Gibraltar Caving Group}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Bruce Cooper|Bruce Cooper|Gibraltar Caving Group}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Bruce Cooper]]''' was the last surviving member of a six-man team who volunteered to be sealed in a [[World War II]] [[observation post]] discovered by the '''[[Gibraltar Caving Group]]''' in 1997?
 
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Bruce Cooper]]''' was the last surviving member of a six-man team who volunteered to be sealed in a [[World War II]] [[observation post]] discovered by the '''[[Gibraltar Caving Group]]''' in 1997?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Joel Gilbert]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/Kafr Zita]] on behalf of ACP2011. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 22:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Joel Gilbert]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/Kafr Zita]] on behalf of ACP2011. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 22:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:ACP2011|ACP2011]] ([[User talk:ACP2011|talk]]).  Self nom at 16:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:ACP2011|ACP2011]] ([[User talk:ACP2011|talk]]).  Self nom at 16:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--Please check to make sure these auto-generated credits are correct.
 
*{{DYKmake|Bruce Cooper|ACP2011|subpage=Bruce Cooper}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Gibraltar Caving Group|ACP2011|subpage=Bruce Cooper}}
 
-->
 
  
 
; Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options]], Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
 
; Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options]], Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
Line 28: Line 17:
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Both articles were created within 5 days of posting, are well-cited throughout, and have no NPOV or copyvio issues apparent; the hook is short enough, catchy enough, and cited in both articles; QPQ performed, and no COI or POV issues detected, per Wikiproject guidelines.  Good to go!  [[User:Cdtew|'''<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Cdtew</span>''']] ([[User talk:Cdtew|talk]]) 20:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Both articles were created within 5 days of posting, are well-cited throughout, and have no NPOV or copyvio issues apparent; the hook is short enough, catchy enough, and cited in both articles; QPQ performed, and no COI or POV issues detected, per Wikiproject guidelines.  Good to go!  [[User:Cdtew|'''<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">Cdtew</span>''']] ([[User talk:Cdtew|talk]]) 20:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
  
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 03:17, 31 January 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Bruce Cooper, Gibraltar Caving Group

Created/expanded by ACP2011 (talk). Self nom at 16:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
  • Review 1 (both articles):
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Both articles are fine - a very interesting topic and hook (which is supported by references in both articles). Articles are well-referenced to sources of decent quality. Both are well-written and nicely illustrated. No conceivable COI or POV in either article. Prioryman (talk) 21:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Review 2 (both articles):
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Both articles were created within 5 days of posting, are well-cited throughout, and have no NPOV or copyvio issues apparent; the hook is short enough, catchy enough, and cited in both articles; QPQ performed, and no COI or POV issues detected, per Wikiproject guidelines. Good to go! Cdtew (talk) 20:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)