Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Brut Chronicle"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>TonyBallioni
(gtg)
imported>Serial Number 54129
(ice one)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough (transcluded late/wrong date, but nom was made day of, and all the content was there.) Long enough. No copyvio or close plagiarism detected. Neutral and cited. QPQ done and the hook is interesting and short enough. Good to go.<p>{{replyto|Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|Drmies}} really enjoyed reading this. A nice break from 17th century conclaves :) If you wouldn't mind a quick stylistic comment: the article seemed a slightly heavy on parenthetical comments that threw me off a bit as a reader. Not a huge issue, but the one thing that stood out to me. Anyway, great work and thanks for the interesting read. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 03:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough (transcluded late/wrong date, but nom was made day of, and all the content was there.) Long enough. No copyvio or close plagiarism detected. Neutral and cited. QPQ done and the hook is interesting and short enough. Good to go.<p>{{replyto|Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|Drmies}} really enjoyed reading this. A nice break from 17th century conclaves :) If you wouldn't mind a quick stylistic comment: the article seemed a slightly heavy on parenthetical comments that threw me off a bit as a reader. Not a huge issue, but the one thing that stood out to me. Anyway, great work and thanks for the interesting read. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 03:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 +
::Thanks {{u|TonyBallioni}}  :) I blame {{u|Drmies}} for those bits, of course  ;) Cheers!  &mdash; [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:maroon; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''O Fortuna'''</span>]][[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:navy"><sup>''''' semper crescis, aut decrescis'''''</sup></span>]] 15:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:22, 13 June 2017

Brut Chronicle

  • ... Did you know that in medieval England, the Brut Chronicle was one of the most-copied chronicles of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries?[1]
  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough (transcluded late/wrong date, but nom was made day of, and all the content was there.) Long enough. No copyvio or close plagiarism detected. Neutral and cited. QPQ done and the hook is interesting and short enough. Good to go.

    Template:Replyto really enjoyed reading this. A nice break from 17th century conclaves :) If you wouldn't mind a quick stylistic comment: the article seemed a slightly heavy on parenthetical comments that threw me off a bit as a reader. Not a huge issue, but the one thing that stood out to me. Anyway, great work and thanks for the interesting read. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Template:U :) I blame Template:U for those bits, of course ;) Cheers! — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 15:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)