Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Brutus (Michelangelo)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Groupuscule
 
imported>Surtsicna
Line 23: Line 23:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Sufficiently expanded three days prior to nomination, and with a single edit! It would have taken me 15 at least :) The article is twice as long as it needs to be to qualify. I see no neutrality or sourcing issues. The references are properly cited; I added one to the only unsourced piece of information and also made a few tweaks. I could not access the sources supporting the hooks, but I verified the hooks through a Google Books search. This also means I cannot confirm that there is no close paraphrasing, but I think we can assume good faith as the author/nominator is an experienced user. The images are all free of copyright violations.<br>The hooks are all short and punchy, but Michelangelo should be linked. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 12:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 
 
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 12:50, 11 November 2017

Brutus (Michelangelo)

Michelangelo's Brutus
Michelangelo's Brutus
  • ... that opposition to tyranny in sixteenth-century Florence led Michelangelo to sculpt a heroic Brutus (pictured)? Source: De Tolnay 1975, Wilde 1978
    • ALT1:... that Michelangelo's Brutus (pictured) wears a pin showing his own face? Source: De Tolnay 1935
    • ALT2:... that to sculpt Caesar's assassin Brutus (pictured), Michelangelo studied his appearance from antique coins? Source: Vasari, De Tolnay 1935

5x expanded by Groupuscule (talk). Self-nominated at 12:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Sufficiently expanded three days prior to nomination, and with a single edit! It would have taken me 15 at least :) The article is twice as long as it needs to be to qualify. I see no neutrality or sourcing issues. The references are properly cited; I added one to the only unsourced piece of information and also made a few tweaks. I could not access the sources supporting the hooks, but I verified the hooks through a Google Books search. This also means I cannot confirm that there is no close paraphrasing, but I think we can assume good faith as the author/nominator is an experienced user. The images are all free of copyright violations.
    The hooks are all short and punchy, but Michelangelo should be linked. Surtsicna (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)