Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Buchwaldoboletus lignicola"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (nominate) |
imported>Graeme Bartlett (good to go) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:* <!--Make first comment here--> | :* <!--Make first comment here--> | ||
| − | + | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article big enough, Expanded enough in the last couple of days, QPQ is done. Article is referenced throughout. Hook is short enough, referenced, I cannot read the reference provided, bu AGF as fact is almost confirmed in other references which say possibly. Image is free and suitable. Good to go [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 06:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 06:04, 26 May 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Buchwaldoboletus lignicola
- ... that the mushroom Buchwaldoboletus lignicola (pictured) is parasitic on another fungus - Phaeolus schweinitzii?
5x expanded by Casliber (talk), Sasata (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 05:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC).
Article big enough, Expanded enough in the last couple of days, QPQ is done. Article is referenced throughout. Hook is short enough, referenced, I cannot read the reference provided, bu AGF as fact is almost confirmed in other references which say possibly. Image is free and suitable. Good to go Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
