Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Buchwaldoboletus lignicola"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492 (to prep 1) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome for *mp; no change in content) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[File:Buchwaldoboletus lignicola 102705.jpg|100x100px|Buchwaldoboletus lignicola, underside of cap showing pores]] | [[File:Buchwaldoboletus lignicola 102705.jpg|100x100px|Buchwaldoboletus lignicola, underside of cap showing pores]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | *... that the mushroom '''''[[Buchwaldoboletus lignicola]]''''' ''(pictured)'' is parasitic on another fungus – ''[[Phaeolus schweinitzii]]''? | |
| − | : | + | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Eugène Hénard]] |
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]), [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 05:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]), [[User:Sasata|Sasata]] ([[User talk:Sasata|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 05:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:47, 5 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Buchwaldoboletus lignicola
- ... that the mushroom Buchwaldoboletus lignicola (pictured) is parasitic on another fungus – Phaeolus schweinitzii?
5x expanded by Casliber (talk), Sasata (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 05:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC).
Article big enough, Expanded enough in the last couple of days, QPQ is done. Article is referenced throughout. Hook is short enough, referenced, I cannot read the reference provided, bu AGF as fact is almost confirmed in other references which say possibly. Image is free and suitable. Good to go Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
