Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Burebista"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gerda Arendt
(bold subject, and we don't need the full citation here)
imported>Jmabel
(Reviewed. Looks good to go.)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* ... that the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' would have been at conflict with Julius Caesar had not both of them died by assassination before Caesar's planned campaign could begin? <small>Source: material comes from the '''Caesar's civil war''' section of the article; {{tq|Caesar was also aware of the growing strength of the Dacians and had himself planned to lead an attack against Burebista}} cited to{{sfn|Bunson|2014|p=165}} and {{tq|But Caesar was never able to start his intended campaign because he was assassinated in 44 BC.[11][2][8] Burebista met with the same fate as a civil uprising had him killed in either 45 or 44 BC}} and cited variously to{{sfn|Phang|Spence|Kelly|Londey|2016|page=745}}{{sfn|Hitchins|2014|page=7}}{{sfn|Schmitz|2005|page=10}}{{sfn|Middleton|2015|page=223}}{{sfn|Bunson|2014|page=163}}</small>
 
* ... that the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' would have been at conflict with Julius Caesar had not both of them died by assassination before Caesar's planned campaign could begin? <small>Source: material comes from the '''Caesar's civil war''' section of the article; {{tq|Caesar was also aware of the growing strength of the Dacians and had himself planned to lead an attack against Burebista}} cited to{{sfn|Bunson|2014|p=165}} and {{tq|But Caesar was never able to start his intended campaign because he was assassinated in 44 BC.[11][2][8] Burebista met with the same fate as a civil uprising had him killed in either 45 or 44 BC}} and cited variously to{{sfn|Phang|Spence|Kelly|Londey|2016|page=745}}{{sfn|Hitchins|2014|page=7}}{{sfn|Schmitz|2005|page=10}}{{sfn|Middleton|2015|page=223}}{{sfn|Bunson|2014|page=163}}</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' came into conflict with Julius Caesar for supporting Pompey in the Roman civil war of 49&ndash;44B.C., however, the untimely death of both parties prevented any campaign?  <small>Source: Same sources as above, material comes from the same section, with addition citation to; {{tq|During the Roman civil war of 49-44 BC, Pompey gained the support of Burebista through Akornion of Dionysopolis}} cited to {{sfn|Phang|Spence|Kelly|Londey|2016|page=745}}. '''Note:''' You can replace "Roman civil war of 49&ndash;44B.C." with Caesar's civil war or Great Roman civil war for some character reduction (Rcwo49-44 as in hook 28 chars/Ccw 18chars/GRcw 21chars).</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' came into conflict with Julius Caesar for supporting Pompey in the Roman civil war of 49&ndash;44B.C., however, the untimely death of both parties prevented any campaign?  <small>Source: Same sources as above, material comes from the same section, with addition citation to; {{tq|During the Roman civil war of 49-44 BC, Pompey gained the support of Burebista through Akornion of Dionysopolis}} cited to {{sfn|Phang|Spence|Kelly|Londey|2016|page=745}}. '''Note:''' You can replace "Roman civil war of 49&ndash;44B.C." with Caesar's civil war or Great Roman civil war for some character reduction (Rcwo49-44 as in hook 28 chars/Ccw 18chars/GRcw 21chars).</small>
 +
** '''ALT2''':... that looming war between the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' and Julius Caesar was preempted by the assassination of both leaders in 44BC?
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Mr rnddude|Mr rnddude]] ([[User talk:Mr rnddude|talk]]). Self-nominated at 05:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Mr rnddude|Mr rnddude]] ([[User talk:Mr rnddude|talk]]). Self-nominated at 05:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC).</small>
Line 19: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] For a GA, it could still use some copy-editing (I fixed a couple of things), but since GA status has already been granted, that is neither here nor there. Covers its topic well. Hook is certainly justified. I've proposed ALT2 as a possibly tighter wording for the hook.
  
 
{{reflist-talk}}
 
{{reflist-talk}}
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 04:18, 17 October 2017

Burebista

  • ... that the Dacian king Burebista would have been at conflict with Julius Caesar had not both of them died by assassination before Caesar's planned campaign could begin? Source: material comes from the Caesar's civil war section of the article; Template:Tq cited to[1] and Template:Tq and cited variously to[2][3][4][5][6]
    • ALT1:... that the Dacian king Burebista came into conflict with Julius Caesar for supporting Pompey in the Roman civil war of 49–44B.C., however, the untimely death of both parties prevented any campaign? Source: Same sources as above, material comes from the same section, with addition citation to; Template:Tq cited to [2]. Note: You can replace "Roman civil war of 49–44B.C." with Caesar's civil war or Great Roman civil war for some character reduction (Rcwo49-44 as in hook 28 chars/Ccw 18chars/GRcw 21chars).
    • ALT2:... that looming war between the Dacian king Burebista and Julius Caesar was preempted by the assassination of both leaders in 44BC?

Improved to Good Article status by Mr rnddude (talk). Self-nominated at 05:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg For a GA, it could still use some copy-editing (I fixed a couple of things), but since GA status has already been granted, that is neither here nor there. Covers its topic well. Hook is certainly justified. I've proposed ALT2 as a possibly tighter wording for the hook.

Template:Reflist-talk

  1. Bunson 2014, p. 165.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Phang et al. 2016, p. 745.
  3. Hitchins 2014, p. 7.
  4. Schmitz 2005, p. 10.
  5. Middleton 2015, p. 223.
  6. Bunson 2014, p. 163.