Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Burebista"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jmabel (Reviewed. Looks good to go.) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 6) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Burebista==== | ====Burebista==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Burebista|Burebista}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Burebista|Burebista}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' would have been at conflict with Julius Caesar had not both of them died by assassination before Caesar's planned campaign could begin? <small>Source: material comes from the '''Caesar's civil war''' section of the article; {{tq|Caesar was also aware of the growing strength of the Dacians and had himself planned to lead an attack against Burebista}} cited to{{sfn|Bunson|2014|p=165}} and {{tq|But Caesar was never able to start his intended campaign because he was assassinated in 44 BC.[11][2][8] Burebista met with the same fate as a civil uprising had him killed in either 45 or 44 BC}} and cited variously to{{sfn|Phang|Spence|Kelly|Londey|2016|page=745}}{{sfn|Hitchins|2014|page=7}}{{sfn|Schmitz|2005|page=10}}{{sfn|Middleton|2015|page=223}}{{sfn|Bunson|2014|page=163}}</small> | * ... that the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' would have been at conflict with Julius Caesar had not both of them died by assassination before Caesar's planned campaign could begin? <small>Source: material comes from the '''Caesar's civil war''' section of the article; {{tq|Caesar was also aware of the growing strength of the Dacians and had himself planned to lead an attack against Burebista}} cited to{{sfn|Bunson|2014|p=165}} and {{tq|But Caesar was never able to start his intended campaign because he was assassinated in 44 BC.[11][2][8] Burebista met with the same fate as a civil uprising had him killed in either 45 or 44 BC}} and cited variously to{{sfn|Phang|Spence|Kelly|Londey|2016|page=745}}{{sfn|Hitchins|2014|page=7}}{{sfn|Schmitz|2005|page=10}}{{sfn|Middleton|2015|page=223}}{{sfn|Bunson|2014|page=163}}</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' came into conflict with Julius Caesar for supporting Pompey in the Roman civil war of 49–44B.C., however, the untimely death of both parties prevented any campaign? <small>Source: Same sources as above, material comes from the same section, with addition citation to; {{tq|During the Roman civil war of 49-44 BC, Pompey gained the support of Burebista through Akornion of Dionysopolis}} cited to {{sfn|Phang|Spence|Kelly|Londey|2016|page=745}}. '''Note:''' You can replace "Roman civil war of 49–44B.C." with Caesar's civil war or Great Roman civil war for some character reduction (Rcwo49-44 as in hook 28 chars/Ccw 18chars/GRcw 21chars).</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that the Dacian king '''[[Burebista]]''' came into conflict with Julius Caesar for supporting Pompey in the Roman civil war of 49–44B.C., however, the untimely death of both parties prevented any campaign? <small>Source: Same sources as above, material comes from the same section, with addition citation to; {{tq|During the Roman civil war of 49-44 BC, Pompey gained the support of Burebista through Akornion of Dionysopolis}} cited to {{sfn|Phang|Spence|Kelly|Londey|2016|page=745}}. '''Note:''' You can replace "Roman civil war of 49–44B.C." with Caesar's civil war or Great Roman civil war for some character reduction (Rcwo49-44 as in hook 28 chars/Ccw 18chars/GRcw 21chars).</small> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
:* | :* | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Mr rnddude|Mr rnddude]] ([[User talk:Mr rnddude|talk]]). Self-nominated at 05:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Mr rnddude|Mr rnddude]] ([[User talk:Mr rnddude|talk]]). Self-nominated at 05:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] For a GA, it could still use some copy-editing (I fixed a couple of things), but since GA status has already been granted, that is neither here nor there. Covers its topic well. Hook is certainly justified. I've proposed ALT2 as a possibly tighter wording for the hook. | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] For a GA, it could still use some copy-editing (I fixed a couple of things), but since GA status has already been granted, that is neither here nor there. Covers its topic well. Hook is certainly justified. I've proposed ALT2 as a possibly tighter wording for the hook. | ||
| − | {{reflist-talk}} | + | {{reflist-talk}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 06:12, 18 October 2017
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Burebista
- ... that the Dacian king Burebista would have been at conflict with Julius Caesar had not both of them died by assassination before Caesar's planned campaign could begin? Source: material comes from the Caesar's civil war section of the article; Template:Tq cited to[1] and Template:Tq and cited variously to[2][3][4][5][6]
- ALT1:... that the Dacian king Burebista came into conflict with Julius Caesar for supporting Pompey in the Roman civil war of 49–44B.C., however, the untimely death of both parties prevented any campaign? Source: Same sources as above, material comes from the same section, with addition citation to; Template:Tq cited to [2]. Note: You can replace "Roman civil war of 49–44B.C." with Caesar's civil war or Great Roman civil war for some character reduction (Rcwo49-44 as in hook 28 chars/Ccw 18chars/GRcw 21chars).
- ALT2:... that looming war between the Dacian king Burebista and Julius Caesar was preempted by the assassination of both leaders in 44BC?
Improved to Good Article status by Mr rnddude (talk). Self-nominated at 05:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC).
- ↑ Bunson 2014, p. 165.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Phang et al. 2016, p. 745.
- ↑ Hitchins 2014, p. 7.
- ↑ Schmitz 2005, p. 10.
- ↑ Middleton 2015, p. 223.
- ↑ Bunson 2014, p. 163.