Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Burnt Bridge Creek"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bouchecl (Reviewed as passed (new reviewer, please double-check)) |
imported>Bouchecl m (formating my review) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:*<!--Make first comment here--> | :*<!--Make first comment here--> | ||
− | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Statement checks out. Created on 1/20/2013, article barely qualifies (1,683 characters readable prose size) according to DYK check. [[User:Bouchecl|Bouchecl]] ([[User talk:Bouchecl|talk]]) 18:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC) | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Statement checks out. Created on 1/20/2013, article barely qualifies (1,683 characters readable prose size) according to DYK check. [[User:Bouchecl|Bouchecl]] ([[User talk:Bouchecl|talk]]) 18:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 21:29, 20 January 2013
Burnt Bridge Creek
- ... that although Burnt Bridge Creek does not meet Washington Dept. of Ecology standards for fecal bacteria, temperature, pH, and oxygen levels, the lowermost part of the creek supports Coho salmon?
- Reviewed: Lepiota nirupama
Created by Finetooth (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 12:11, 20 January 2013 (UTC)