Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cannon Fodder (video game)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Not a huge fan of cited infoboxes but I realise music and video games kind of have this as a convention so will tick good to go on this as cited infobox covers points in the lead that I found problematic. --LauraHale (talk) 11:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
imported>Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr |
imported>Crisco 1492 (to prep 3) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from July 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 09:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)<br />}} |
====Cannon Fodder (video game)==== | ====Cannon Fodder (video game)==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cannon Fodder (video game)|Cannon Fodder (video game)}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cannon Fodder (video game)|Cannon Fodder (video game)}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{*mp}}... that video game '''''[[Cannon Fodder (video game)|Cannon Fodder]]''''', intended as an anti-war satire, drew controversy for its juxtaposition of violence and humour as well as its choice of [[Remembrance poppy|iconography]]? | {{*mp}}... that video game '''''[[Cannon Fodder (video game)|Cannon Fodder]]''''', intended as an anti-war satire, drew controversy for its juxtaposition of violence and humour as well as its choice of [[Remembrance poppy|iconography]]? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Miro Sipek|Miro Spikek]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Miro Sipek|Miro Spikek]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Bridies|Bridies]] ([[User talk:Bridies|talk]]). Self nom at 06:34, 21 July 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Bridies|Bridies]] ([[User talk:Bridies|talk]]). Self nom at 06:34, 21 July 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | :* | + | :* |
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] QPQ done. New enough. Long enough. image has fair use rationale. Article is neutral enough. Hooked fact found in article and supported by sources. | * [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] QPQ done. New enough. Long enough. image has fair use rationale. Article is neutral enough. Hooked fact found in article and supported by sources. | ||
Line 26: | Line 16: | ||
::I've added cites for the release date, developer, publisher and the plethora of (I believe identical) ports in the infobox. [[User:Bridies|bridies]] ([[User talk:Bridies|talk]]) 10:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC) | ::I've added cites for the release date, developer, publisher and the plethora of (I believe identical) ports in the infobox. [[User:Bridies|bridies]] ([[User talk:Bridies|talk]]) 10:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Not a huge fan of cited infoboxes but I realise music and video games kind of have this as a convention so will tick good to go on this as cited infobox covers points in the lead that I found problematic. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 11:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC) | + | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Not a huge fan of cited infoboxes but I realise music and video games kind of have this as a convention so will tick good to go on this as cited infobox covers points in the lead that I found problematic. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 11:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− | |||
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 09:08, 31 July 2012
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Cannon Fodder (video game)
- ... that video game Cannon Fodder, intended as an anti-war satire, drew controversy for its juxtaposition of violence and humour as well as its choice of iconography?
- Reviewed: Miro Spikek
Created/expanded by Bridies (talk). Self nom at 06:34, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
QPQ done. New enough. Long enough. image has fair use rationale. Article is neutral enough. Hooked fact found in article and supported by sources.
Offline sources support the article and were not plagiarised to write the article.
Similar issues to previous article about Cannon Fodder: "Cannon Fodder is an action-strategy shoot 'em up game developed by Sensible Software and published by Virgin Interactive for the Amiga in 1993. Virgin ported the game to home computer systems DOS and the Archimedes, and the consoles Jaguar, Mega Drive, SNES and 3DO in 1995." is on the lead but does not appear to be supported by the body of the article. --LauraHale (talk) 03:02, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
