Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Carneddau"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome for *mp; no change in content)
imported>IznoBot
m (→‎top: Lint DYKN archive pattern (Task 2))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
 
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Carneddau]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Carneddau|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Carneddau|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</i></span>{{clear}}
+
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Carneddau]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Carneddau|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Carneddau|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</span></i>{{clear}}
  
 
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 04:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC).<br />
 
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 04:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC).<br />

Latest revision as of 04:02, 19 October 2018

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Carneddau's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC).

Carneddau, Glyderau

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 12:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC).

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article expansion ratios check out - 219 words to 1223 for the first, 181 to 1052 for the second. Expansion start dates also check out, 26 February for the first, more recent for the second. Hook length is fine, interest level okay, source not available online but is a 48-page National Trust pamphlet, should be reliable. Policy criteria all met in both articles. Good job and good to go. Wasted Time R (talk) 21:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg One section appears to have been copied from one article to the other, and removing it from either would leave that article short of 5x expansion. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Well, the geology was common to the two adjoining ranges of mountains so I thought it permissible to use the same paragraph in both. I have now removed/rewritten/added material to both articles so that the text is dissimilar. They are still both long enough for the five-fold expansion I believe. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
  • You can use the same paragraph in both, it just doesn't count towards the expansion. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)