Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Carolina Neurath"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BabbaQ
(perhaps it should stay)
imported>Staceydolxx
(Just needs image reviewing then G2G!)
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 
:*{{ping|George Ho}}.--[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 16:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:*{{ping|George Ho}}.--[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 16:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
:*New – Page created on 21st Dec and nominated on 25th Dec.
 +
:*Long enough – the prose portion is at least 1,500 characters.
 +
:*Within policy – The article is neutral and has inline citations for all the information. I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations.
 +
:*Hook - The hook is interesting, fewer than 200 characters and is referenced in the article with inline citations.
 +
:*QPQ - Done.
 +
:*Image - ???
 +
: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]- Nice work BabbaQ; good use of Swedish sources and lots of citations. I think its G2G! Just need someone else to please review image as I don't have much experience with reviewing photos ツ[[user:Staceydolxx|Stacey]] ([[user talk:Staceydolxx|talk]]) 14:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:04, 13 January 2015

Carolina Neurath

Carolina Neurath (2012)

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self nominated at 23:32, 25 December 2014 (UTC).

  • New – Page created on 21st Dec and nominated on 25th Dec.
  • Long enough – the prose portion is at least 1,500 characters.
  • Within policy – The article is neutral and has inline citations for all the information. I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations.
  • Hook - The hook is interesting, fewer than 200 characters and is referenced in the article with inline citations.
  • QPQ - Done.
  • Image - ???
Symbol question.svg- Nice work BabbaQ; good use of Swedish sources and lots of citations. I think its G2G! Just need someone else to please review image as I don't have much experience with reviewing photos ツStacey (talk) 14:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)