Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cassianellidae"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Kevmin (Created nom) |
imported>Rlendog (good, with suggestion) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :*<!--Make first comment here--> | + | :*<!--Make first comment here-->[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough and well enough referenced, with no copyvios (at least to the online sources, I did not have access to check source 3). The hook checks out, the word "may" being key. The wording of the 2nd half of the hook does seem a bit awkward to me. Although I don't think it is essential, it might be worth considering rewording along the lines of '''ALT1''' ... that the extinct, [[Triassic]], bivalve family '''[[Cassianellidae]]''' may have evolved from the family [[Bakevelliidae]], which survived longer into the [[Eocene]]? |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 3 January 2012
Cassianellidae
- ... that the extinct, Triassic, bivalve family Cassianellidae may have evolved from the longer lived family Bakevelliidae?
- Reviewed: Elaeagnus pungens
Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 12:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough and well enough referenced, with no copyvios (at least to the online sources, I did not have access to check source 3). The hook checks out, the word "may" being key. The wording of the 2nd half of the hook does seem a bit awkward to me. Although I don't think it is essential, it might be worth considering rewording along the lines of ALT1 ... that the extinct, Triassic, bivalve family Cassianellidae may have evolved from the family Bakevelliidae, which survived longer into the Eocene?