Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Central Leather Research Institute"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mspraveen (ALT 2) |
imported>Ktr101 (reviewed it) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::* '''ALT 1''' ... that '''[[Central Leather Research Institute]]''', which was founded in 1948 in [[Chennai]], is a leading institute in terms of [[research papers|research publications]] and [[patents]]? [[User:Mspraveen|Mspraveen]] ([[User talk:Mspraveen|talk]]) 06:24, 18 August 2012 (UTC) | ::* '''ALT 1''' ... that '''[[Central Leather Research Institute]]''', which was founded in 1948 in [[Chennai]], is a leading institute in terms of [[research papers|research publications]] and [[patents]]? [[User:Mspraveen|Mspraveen]] ([[User talk:Mspraveen|talk]]) 06:24, 18 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::*Still far too vague. "Leading" among what group? Among all research institutes as a broad category? Among leather research institutes that happen to be located in Chennai? And how many publications and patents does one need to be "leading", anyway? —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 21:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | :::*Still far too vague. "Leading" among what group? Among all research institutes as a broad category? Among leather research institutes that happen to be located in Chennai? And how many publications and patents does one need to be "leading", anyway? —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 21:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | *'''ALT 2''' ... that the erstwhile [[Madras State]] awarded {{convert|75|acre|ha sqmi|lk=on}} to the [[Council of Scientific and Industrial Research]] for the establishment of '''[[Central Leather Research Institute]]'''? [[User:Mspraveen|Mspraveen]] ([[User talk:Mspraveen|talk]]) 04:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | + | *'''ALT 2''' ... that the <s>erstwhile</s> [[Madras State]] awarded {{convert|75|acre|ha sqmi|lk=on}} to the [[Council of Scientific and Industrial Research]] for the establishment of '''[[Central Leather Research Institute]]'''? [[User:Mspraveen|Mspraveen]] ([[User talk:Mspraveen|talk]]) 04:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
+ | |||
+ | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, date, and various aspects of this article check out, and this article was new enough at the time of its nomination to be eligible. I struck "erstwhile" from the hook, as it is a bit awkward within the prose. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 04:20, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 04:20, 11 September 2012
Central Leather Research Institute
- ... that Central Leather Research Institute, which was founded in 1948 in Chennai, is the world's largest center of its kind?
- Reviewed: 2000 Summer Olympics torch relay
- Comment: 5x expansion
Created/expanded by Mspraveen (talk). Self nom at 08:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please? Can we not say "of its kind". I speak as the cleverest, tallest, fattest, thinnest, stupidest and smallest person "of their kind" when I tell you that the boast needs to more specific Victuallers (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- ALT 1 ... that Central Leather Research Institute, which was founded in 1948 in Chennai, is a leading institute in terms of research publications and patents? Mspraveen (talk) 06:24, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Still far too vague. "Leading" among what group? Among all research institutes as a broad category? Among leather research institutes that happen to be located in Chennai? And how many publications and patents does one need to be "leading", anyway? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- ALT 2 ... that the
erstwhileMadras State awarded 75 acres (30 ha; 0.117 sq mi) to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for the establishment of Central Leather Research Institute? Mspraveen (talk) 04:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Length, date, and various aspects of this article check out, and this article was new enough at the time of its nomination to be eligible. I struck "erstwhile" from the hook, as it is a bit awkward within the prose. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:20, 11 September 2012 (UTC)