Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Jones (engineer)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>MWright96 (review) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Promoted to Prep 2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from December 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|Charles Jones (engineer)}} | {{DYK header|Charles Jones (engineer)}} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
{{main page image|image=Southern portal, Sapperton canal tunnel (uncropped).jpg|caption=The southern portal of the [[Sapperton Canal Tunnel|Sapperton Tunnel]]|width=133x150}} | {{main page image|image=Southern portal, Sapperton canal tunnel (uncropped).jpg|caption=The southern portal of the [[Sapperton Canal Tunnel|Sapperton Tunnel]]|width=133x150}} | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that despite gaining the contract to dig [[Sapperton Canal Tunnel|the longest canal tunnel]] in the UK ''(pictured)'', '''[[Charles Jones (engineer)|Charles Jones]]''' already had a reputation for ineptitude and dishonesty? <small>Source: "In the 1770s he [...] gained a reputation for singular ineptitude if not downright dishonesty [...] however in 1783 he had successfully tendered for driving the 2 mile long Sapperton Tunnel"</small> | * ... that despite gaining the contract to dig [[Sapperton Canal Tunnel|the longest canal tunnel]] in the UK ''(pictured)'', '''[[Charles Jones (engineer)|Charles Jones]]''' already had a reputation for ineptitude and dishonesty? <small>Source: "In the 1770s he [...] gained a reputation for singular ineptitude if not downright dishonesty [...] however in 1783 he had successfully tendered for driving the 2 mile long Sapperton Tunnel"</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Horsemanship of Ulysses S. Grant]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Horsemanship of Ulysses S. Grant]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:MIDI|MIDI]] ([[User talk:MIDI|talk]]). Self-nominated at 12:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:MIDI|MIDI]] ([[User talk:MIDI|talk]]). Self-nominated at 12:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Nominated on day of creation and meets the length guidelines. QPQ done. Article is neutral, reliably sourced and not a copyright violation. Hooks is fascinating and sourced to a reliable citation. Whilst the hook mentions a negative about Jones, i am of the opinion it is not done so unduly and is a neutral statement of fact. Am not able to check the book itself because it is not online so will pass in good faith. Off-topic comment: the third and final sentence in the second paragraph is missing a citation to verify that particular piece of information. [[User:MWright96|MWright96]] [[User talk:MWright96|(talk)]] 22:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Nominated on day of creation and meets the length guidelines. QPQ done. Article is neutral, reliably sourced and not a copyright violation. Hooks is fascinating and sourced to a reliable citation. Whilst the hook mentions a negative about Jones, i am of the opinion it is not done so unduly and is a neutral statement of fact. Am not able to check the book itself because it is not online so will pass in good faith. Off-topic comment: the third and final sentence in the second paragraph is missing a citation to verify that particular piece of information. [[User:MWright96|MWright96]] [[User talk:MWright96|(talk)]] 22:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | {{-}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 07:00, 20 January 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Charles Jones (engineer)

The southern portal of the Sapperton Tunnel
- ... that despite gaining the contract to dig the longest canal tunnel in the UK (pictured), Charles Jones already had a reputation for ineptitude and dishonesty? Source: "In the 1770s he [...] gained a reputation for singular ineptitude if not downright dishonesty [...] however in 1783 he had successfully tendered for driving the 2 mile long Sapperton Tunnel"
Created by MIDI (talk). Self-nominated at 12:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC).
Nominated on day of creation and meets the length guidelines. QPQ done. Article is neutral, reliably sourced and not a copyright violation. Hooks is fascinating and sourced to a reliable citation. Whilst the hook mentions a negative about Jones, i am of the opinion it is not done so unduly and is a neutral statement of fact. Am not able to check the book itself because it is not online so will pass in good faith. Off-topic comment: the third and final sentence in the second paragraph is missing a citation to verify that particular piece of information. MWright96 (talk) 22:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)