Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Lamberton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Victuallers (tick) |
imported>Yoninah (strikethrough) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | {{*mp}}... that '''[[Charles Lamberton]]''' was a French [[Paleontology|paleontologist]] | + | {{*mp}}<s>... that '''[[Charles Lamberton]]''' was a French [[Paleontology|paleontologist]] who tactfully refuted a theory claiming that some [[Subfossil lemur|extinct, giant lemurs]] were aquatic and that one of them was an "arboreal-aquatic acrobat"?</s> |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::::I added the cite to the sentence in question. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 10:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | ::::I added the cite to the sentence in question. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 10:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{DYKtickAGF}} Thanks Yoninah - Alt is fine [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 16:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | {{DYKtickAGF}} Thanks Yoninah - Alt is fine [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 16:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | <!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 17:28, 21 February 2012
Charles Lamberton
... that Charles Lamberton was a French paleontologist who tactfully refuted a theory claiming that some extinct, giant lemurs were aquatic and that one of them was an "arboreal-aquatic acrobat"?
- Reviewed: Henry Seymour (secularist)
Created/expanded by Visionholder (talk). Self nom at 07:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Age, length, referencing all OK. No close paraphrasing seen in sources. Regarding the hook, "tactful" is not at all what the source or your article says. Would you like to write something like:- ALT1: ... that French paleontologist Charles Lamberton scathingly rebutted a theory claiming that some extinct, giant lemurs were aquatic and that one of them was an "arboreal-aquatic acrobat"? Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good - could you add a cite on the precise sentence in the paragraph for the dyk fact please Victuallers (talk) 22:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Technically, the citation is at the end of the paragraph. It covers all of the information between it and the previous citation. That approach also seems to pass FAC. If this is a little quirk of DYK, then I can duplicate the ref until the DYK is done... – VisionHolder « talk » 00:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure was that "a yes"? Victuallers (talk) 09:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Technically, the citation is at the end of the paragraph. It covers all of the information between it and the previous citation. That approach also seems to pass FAC. If this is a little quirk of DYK, then I can duplicate the ref until the DYK is done... – VisionHolder « talk » 00:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Yoninah - Alt is fine Victuallers (talk) 16:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)