Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Chippenham Lodge"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 1)
imported>Schwede66
(should one dab this?)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
[[File:Chippenham Lodge 08.JPG|100x100px|Chippenham Lodge with significant damage from the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake]]
 
[[File:Chippenham Lodge 08.JPG|100x100px|Chippenham Lodge with significant damage from the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
* ... that the owners of [[2011 Christchurch earthquake|earthquake]]-damaged '''[[Chippenham Lodge]]''' ''(pictured)'' have proposed that the homestead be rebuilt in [[Christchurch]]'s [[Hagley Park]]?
+
* ... that the owners of [[2011 Christchurch earthquake|earthquake]]-damaged '''[[Chippenham Lodge]]''' ''(pictured)'' have proposed that the homestead be rebuilt in [[Christchurch]]'s [[Hagley Park (New Zealand)|Hagley Park]]?
 
:* '''ALT1''':view of a historic brick building
 
:* '''ALT1''':view of a historic brick building
 
:*
 
:*

Revision as of 17:25, 18 November 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Chippenham Lodge

Chippenham Lodge with significant damage from the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake

  • ALT1:view of a historic brick building
  • Comment: The article gives plenty of scope for alternative hooks; feel free to suggest any. I'll be away for a week and I don't know whether I'll have internet access (back 2 June).

Created by Schwede66 (talk). Self nominated at 19:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough. NPOV. Checking several of the sources found no close paraphrasing or copyvio issues. Very well-cited, including the good hook. Image is suitably licensed. But, no QPQ review has been done! Edwardx (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. I'm back from leave and have done the QPQ just now. Schwede66 22:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Welcome back. Now good to go. Edwardx (talk) 22:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)