Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Chippenham Lodge"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Schwede66 (should one dab this?) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough. NPOV. Checking several of the sources found no close paraphrasing or copyvio issues. Very well-cited, including the good hook. Image is suitably licensed. But, no QPQ review has been done! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 09:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough. NPOV. Checking several of the sources found no close paraphrasing or copyvio issues. Very well-cited, including the good hook. Image is suitably licensed. But, no QPQ review has been done! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 09:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::*Thanks for the review. I'm back from leave and have done the [[Template:Did you know nominations/June 4th Museum|QPQ]] just now. '''< | + | ::*Thanks for the review. I'm back from leave and have done the [[Template:Did you know nominations/June 4th Museum|QPQ]] just now. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:#000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color:#FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 22:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC) |
:::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Welcome back. Now good to go. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 22:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC) | :::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Welcome back. Now good to go. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 22:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:51, 28 January 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chippenham Lodge
- ... that the owners of earthquake-damaged Chippenham Lodge (pictured) have proposed that the homestead be rebuilt in Christchurch's Hagley Park?
- ALT1:view of a historic brick building
- Comment: The article gives plenty of scope for alternative hooks; feel free to suggest any. I'll be away for a week and I don't know whether I'll have internet access (back 2 June).
Created by Schwede66 (talk). Self nominated at 19:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC).