Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Brooks (gymnast)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yngvadottir
(Didn't really have refs before, but sources. *Cough* unreferenced BLP expansion?)
imported>Yngvadottir
(Didn't really have refs before, but sources. *Cough* unreferenced BLP expansion?)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
*{{DYKno}} Expansion is only about 3x (from [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Brooks_(gymnast)&oldid=465048174] to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Brooks_(gymnast)&oldid=468783797]). There is no precedent for waiving the basic DYK criteria just because an editor is new. <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 17:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 
*{{DYKno}} Expansion is only about 3x (from [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Brooks_(gymnast)&oldid=465048174] to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Brooks_(gymnast)&oldid=468783797]). There is no precedent for waiving the basic DYK criteria just because an editor is new. <b class="IPA">[[Special:Contributions/Rjanag|r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ</font>anaɢ]]</b>&nbsp;([[User talk:Rjanag|talk]]) 17:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 
::I would like it considered as a new article, not an expansion.  Has been less than a month.  My understanding is that the time limits could be "Swahili'd" (and we did have some text about that for new submitters).  In the past, I have seen us be pretty generous on the time limit.  And it is under a month.[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User:TCO#Reviews needed|Reviews needed]]) 17:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 
::I would like it considered as a new article, not an expansion.  Has been less than a month.  My understanding is that the time limits could be "Swahili'd" (and we did have some text about that for new submitters).  In the past, I have seen us be pretty generous on the time limit.  And it is under a month.[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User:TCO#Reviews needed|Reviews needed]]) 17:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
::'''Comment''' It's been a bit long for the Swahili exemption. Perhaps an alternative approach - I see that the original stub had no inline references, only 2 sources listed as "references." Perhaps it could be squeezed in as an expansion of an unreferenced BLP . . . which only requires twofold? [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 18:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
+
::'''Comment''' It's been a bit long for the Swahili exemption. Perhaps an alternative approach - I see that the original stub had no inline references, only 2 sources listed as "references." Perhaps it could be squeezed in as an expansion of an unreferenced BLP . . . which only requires twofold? [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 18:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
  
 
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
 
:*<!--Make first comment here-->

Revision as of 18:18, 6 January 2012

Chris Brooks (gymnast)

  • Reviewed: C. A. Patrides
  • Comment: Request Swahili exemption for the time period. Made stub in early December. Another author expanded it just now. He is a newbie...let's get him a DYK.

Created/expanded by Brunettekoala (talk), TCO (talk). Nominated by TCO (talk) at 23:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Expansion is only about 3x (from [1] to [2]). There is no precedent for waiving the basic DYK criteria just because an editor is new. rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I would like it considered as a new article, not an expansion. Has been less than a month. My understanding is that the time limits could be "Swahili'd" (and we did have some text about that for new submitters). In the past, I have seen us be pretty generous on the time limit. And it is under a month.TCO (Reviews needed) 17:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Comment It's been a bit long for the Swahili exemption. Perhaps an alternative approach - I see that the original stub had no inline references, only 2 sources listed as "references." Perhaps it could be squeezed in as an expansion of an unreferenced BLP . . . which only requires twofold? Yngvadottir (talk) 18:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)