Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas darter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dumelow (review) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Response) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> | --> | ||
* ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature|IUCN]]? | * ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature|IUCN]]? | ||
| + | *'''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature]]? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Joc-O-Sot|Joc-O-Sot]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Joc-O-Sot|Joc-O-Sot]] | ||
:* ''Comment'': Better hooks welcome | :* ''Comment'': Better hooks welcome | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Thank you for the review. I have added ALT1 to address the point you raise. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 10:14, 9 December 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Christmas darter
- ... that the Christmas darter is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of least concern by the IUCN?
- ALT1 ... that the Christmas darter is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of least concern by the International Union for Conservation of Nature?
- Reviewed: Joc-O-Sot
- Comment: Better hooks welcome
5x expanded by Enwebb (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 07:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC).
Cwmhiraeth, review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. I have added ALT1 to address the point you raise. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)