Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas darter"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dumelow
(review)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Response)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
-->
 
-->
 
* ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature|IUCN]]?
 
* ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature|IUCN]]?
 +
*'''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature]]?
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Joc-O-Sot|Joc-O-Sot]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Joc-O-Sot|Joc-O-Sot]]
 
:* ''Comment'': Better hooks welcome
 
:* ''Comment'': Better hooks welcome
Line 21: Line 22:
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out.  Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out.  Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 +
:::Thank you for the review. I have added ALT1 to address the point you raise. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:14, 9 December 2019

Christmas darter

  • Reviewed: Joc-O-Sot
  • Comment: Better hooks welcome

5x expanded by Enwebb (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 07:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Cwmhiraeth, review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. I have added ALT1 to address the point you raise. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)