Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas darter"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dumelow
(tick)
imported>97198
(to prep 4)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 06:02, 15 December 2019 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Christmas darter}}
 
{{DYK header|Christmas darter}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Christmas darter|Christmas darter}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Christmas darter|Christmas darter}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature|IUCN]]?
 
* ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature|IUCN]]?
 
*'''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature]]?
 
*'''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Christmas darter]]''' is considered a priority species by the state of South Carolina but of [[Least-concern species|least concern]] by the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature]]?
Line 16: Line 11:
 
:* ''Comment'': Better hooks welcome
 
:* ''Comment'': Better hooks welcome
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Enwebb|Enwebb]] ([[User talk:Enwebb|talk]]) and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) at 07:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Enwebb|Enwebb]] ([[User talk:Enwebb|talk]]) and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) at 07:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Christmas darter|Enwebb|subpage=Christmas darter}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Christmas darter|Cwmhiraeth}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out.  Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out.  Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::Thank you for the review. I have added ALT1 to address the point you raise. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::Thank you for the review. I have added ALT1 to address the point you raise. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thanks [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], tick added to ALT1 also.  I'll leave it to the promoter to decide which to use - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 11:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
+
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thanks [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]], tick added to ALT1 also.  I'll leave it to the promoter to decide which to use - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 11:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 06:02, 15 December 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Christmas darter

  • Reviewed: Joc-O-Sot
  • Comment: Better hooks welcome

5x expanded by Enwebb (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 07:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Cwmhiraeth, review follows: article more than 5x expanded within relevant period; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing in a check on the sources; hook is sufficiently interesting (though is the IUCN sufficiently well known by the acronym to warrant abbreviating its name?); hook facts are mentioned in article and check out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. I have added ALT1 to address the point you raise. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Thanks Cwmhiraeth, tick added to ALT1 also. I'll leave it to the promoter to decide which to use - Dumelow (talk) 11:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)